Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buffalohed" data-source="post: 2841659" data-attributes="member: 573552"><p>The most conservative estimate on the beginning of bacteria on the planet is 2.5 billion years ago, but let's pretend bacteria started when christians think god made the earth (lol), so 6000 years ago. Bacteria are known to double in population as fast as every 9.8 minutes. But let's pretend the first bacteria were slow bacteria and took 98 minutes to double in population. Let's also pretend that this slow reproducing bacteria is of the smallest variety of bacteria, only .5 micrometers long or 5 x 10^-7 meters (an electron is 10^-15 meters long).</p><p></p><p>So that gives us 3.217 x 10^7 doublings of bacteria population, or 2^32170000 (compared to the roughly 1250 doublings of human population in 2 million years).</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately my computer can't process how many bacteria that leaves us with. It is a lot more than the number of humans suggested in the first post though.</p><p></p><p>We have a problem though. The universe (let alone the earth) is only so big, and can only hold so many bacteria. There are an estimated 10^80 subatomic particles in our universe, total. If every inch of space in the universe was packed with subatomic particles, there would be room for less than 10^100 of them. But these subatomic particles are 10,000,000 times smaller than our smallest bacteria. So let's pretend that our tiny bacteria shrink to 1/10,000,000 their size, so that 10^100 of them will just barely fit into our entire universe.</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, this only allows for 332 doublings of population (compared with the 32 million doublings that would occur in 6000 years). Well these doublings of population occur every 98 minutes, but for the sake of jesus science, let's say they occur every 980 minutes.</p><p></p><p>Uh oh. Those 332 doublings, enough to fill the entire universe brim to brim with unbelievably shrunken bacteria, would only take 225 days!</p><p></p><p>What does this tell us?</p><p></p><p>THE WORLD MUST BE LESS THAN 225 DAYS OLD, BECAUSE THAT IS THE ONLY WAY TO ACCOUNT FOR THE NUMBER OF SHRUNKEN BACTERIA THAT WOULD FIT INTO OUR UNIVERSE.</p><p></p><p>Christian logic at its finest. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/*******.gif.a649d21efc0d1fd4890a6428166586c1.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buffalohed, post: 2841659, member: 573552"] The most conservative estimate on the beginning of bacteria on the planet is 2.5 billion years ago, but let's pretend bacteria started when christians think god made the earth (lol), so 6000 years ago. Bacteria are known to double in population as fast as every 9.8 minutes. But let's pretend the first bacteria were slow bacteria and took 98 minutes to double in population. Let's also pretend that this slow reproducing bacteria is of the smallest variety of bacteria, only .5 micrometers long or 5 x 10^-7 meters (an electron is 10^-15 meters long). So that gives us 3.217 x 10^7 doublings of bacteria population, or 2^32170000 (compared to the roughly 1250 doublings of human population in 2 million years). Unfortunately my computer can't process how many bacteria that leaves us with. It is a lot more than the number of humans suggested in the first post though. We have a problem though. The universe (let alone the earth) is only so big, and can only hold so many bacteria. There are an estimated 10^80 subatomic particles in our universe, total. If every inch of space in the universe was packed with subatomic particles, there would be room for less than 10^100 of them. But these subatomic particles are 10,000,000 times smaller than our smallest bacteria. So let's pretend that our tiny bacteria shrink to 1/10,000,000 their size, so that 10^100 of them will just barely fit into our entire universe. Unfortunately, this only allows for 332 doublings of population (compared with the 32 million doublings that would occur in 6000 years). Well these doublings of population occur every 98 minutes, but for the sake of jesus science, let's say they occur every 980 minutes. Uh oh. Those 332 doublings, enough to fill the entire universe brim to brim with unbelievably shrunken bacteria, would only take 225 days! What does this tell us? THE WORLD MUST BE LESS THAN 225 DAYS OLD, BECAUSE THAT IS THE ONLY WAY TO ACCOUNT FOR THE NUMBER OF SHRUNKEN BACTERIA THAT WOULD FIT INTO OUR UNIVERSE. Christian logic at its finest. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/*******.gif.a649d21efc0d1fd4890a6428166586c1.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list