Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ravendarat" data-source="post: 2840695" data-attributes="member: 568925">Hmmm, I stated my opinion on the bible and got mocked, ok I can handle that, its all good. As for the person who asked about links disproving the bible,  lets try to be rational here, and if Im off base correct me in a civilized fashion, I completly welcome it. Many of the things written in the bible, to me at least, seem as though they can be disproved with common sense. Start with the whole reserrection thing, do you truly believe that someone can come back from the dead after being crucified, I sure dont. How about Jesus giving a blind man back his eye site by touching him, do you believe that one? Feeding a mass crowd with, what was it a fish and 2 loafs of bread or something to that effect? Doubt that one two. Its stories like this that make the bible extremely hard to believe in my opinion. There are two many things that are just impossible, and those stories destroy the bibles credibility as a factual book.As someone else said, it would make sense that the reason why no one has written about evolution happening in the past is because they did not have the means in which to understand it. Its not something that you can sit and watch happen in a couple of weeks. Its only in the last 100 years or so that humans have developed the technology and theories such as carbon dating to back up evolution. Just because its, in the grand scheme of things, fairly new to us as a line of thinking, doesnt mean its incorrect. On that same note though, im also not saying that everything we know about evloution is 100% right either, its a work in progress</blockquote>

Verification

Top

What's new

Forum list