Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="nudels" data-source="post: 7446472" data-attributes="member: 634950">so who are you to judge?You say &quot;defame the site&quot;?,.. negative, ghost rider. Our problems are not with a website, but with specific people,.. so in effect, youre stating that we have a generalized agenda with the whole forum that you are suggesting is truth.Now, to the nitty gritty,..We were told to get a vendors status to advertise the site,.. ok, done.Thread goes up titled: &quot;www.soundpressurelistings.com&quot; in the vendors section and bam,.. flamefest. We had actually done the stupid thing and bought into the idea that if the thread were to go south (just as we expected it would from page 1) that the mods would step in to enforce the rules that you so diligently uphold,.. but no, we get mot stating something about not joining that p.o.s. site,.. so before you go saying we were on the negative from the get-go, remind yourself by reading that thread and observe that we were testing the waters not only with the members, but the moderation staff, also.N/m the fact that a genuine interest and execution of vendor status was in the works,.. if anyone is at fault for how things turned out, i would really have to say the moderation team was in derilection of duty. Notice how juan wouldnt delete or mod that thread?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="nudels, post: 7446472, member: 634950"] so who are you to judge? You say "defame the site"?,.. negative, ghost rider. Our problems are not with a website, but with specific people,.. so in effect, youre stating that we have a generalized agenda with the whole forum that you are suggesting is truth. Now, to the nitty gritty,.. We were told to get a vendors status to advertise the site,.. ok, done. Thread goes up titled: "www.soundpressurelistings.com" in the vendors section and bam,.. flamefest. We had actually done the stupid thing and bought into the idea that if the thread were to go south (just as we expected it would from page 1) that the mods would step in to enforce the rules that you so diligently uphold,.. but no, we get mot stating something about not joining that p.o.s. site,.. so before you go saying we were on the negative from the get-go, remind yourself by reading that thread and observe that we were testing the waters not only with the members, but the moderation staff, also. N/m the fact that a genuine interest and execution of vendor status was in the works,.. if anyone is at fault for how things turned out, i would really have to say the moderation team was in derilection of duty. Notice how juan wouldnt delete or mod that thread? [/QUOTE]

Verification