Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
TC Sounds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audio_phill" data-source="post: 7289904" data-attributes="member: 605512"><p>lol, the lms ultra is a low q woofer, only fools with insane power on tap and headroom to match and an audiophile eq should even attempt it. The havoc took it simply because the lms was being ran improperly.</p><p></p><p>Idea enclosure for the lms 5400 is 4.3net @ 25Hz, in sealed, optimum would be 3.4 for an f3 of just over 36hz. Sealing it will give you 4.7dB of loss over the vented enclosure @ 30Hz, and 3.4dB loss at 25Hz, 3dB loss @35Hz...</p><p></p><p>Heres tsp's for original vs new (china version)</p><p></p><p>Old Version</p><p></p><p>Re = 4.0107 ohms</p><p></p><p>Fs = 22.4333 Hz</p><p></p><p>Zmax = 52.5281 ohms</p><p></p><p>Qes = 0.4130</p><p></p><p>Qms = 4.9959</p><p></p><p>Qts = 0.3815</p><p></p><p>Le = 1.9970 mH (at 1 kHz)</p><p></p><p>Diam = 390.8425 mm ( 15.3875 in )</p><p></p><p>Sd =119975.7382 mm^2(185.9628 in^2)</p><p></p><p>Vas = 188.3549 L ( 6.6517 ft^3)</p><p></p><p>BL = 27.3490 N/A</p><p></p><p>Mms = 546.4212 g</p><p></p><p>Cms = 92.1140 uM/N</p><p></p><p>Kms =10856.1182 N/M</p><p></p><p>Rms = 15.4164 R mechanical</p><p></p><p>Efficiency = 0.4838 %</p><p></p><p>Sensitivity= 88.8647 dB @1W/1m</p><p></p><p>New Version</p><p></p><p>Re = 4.1115 ohms</p><p></p><p>Fs = 21.8718 Hz</p><p></p><p>Zmax = 82.0565 ohms</p><p></p><p>Qes = 0.3752</p><p></p><p>Qms = 7.1129</p><p></p><p>Qts = 0.3564</p><p></p><p>Le = 2.4618 mH (at 1 kHz)</p><p></p><p>Diam = 390.8425 mm ( 15.3875 in )</p><p></p><p>Sd =119975.7382 mm^2(185.9628 in^2)</p><p></p><p>Vas = 192.8393 L ( 6.8101 ft^3)</p><p></p><p>BL = 29.0781 N/A</p><p></p><p>Mms = 561.4697 g</p><p></p><p>Cms = 94.3070 uM/N</p><p></p><p>Kms =10603.6641 N/M</p><p></p><p>Rms = 10.8478 R mechanical</p><p></p><p>Efficiency = 0.5053 %</p><p></p><p>Sensitivity= 89.0534 dB @1W/1m</p><p></p><p>Very efficient but lower Q than needed to be an authority subsonic, and not have a more than 1dB output deviation across its usable bandwidth. The LMS 4K 10 has a flatter bandwidth and can play much lower than the LMS 5400, just not with ridiculous output.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audio_phill, post: 7289904, member: 605512"] lol, the lms ultra is a low q woofer, only fools with insane power on tap and headroom to match and an audiophile eq should even attempt it. The havoc took it simply because the lms was being ran improperly. Idea enclosure for the lms 5400 is 4.3net @ 25Hz, in sealed, optimum would be 3.4 for an f3 of just over 36hz. Sealing it will give you 4.7dB of loss over the vented enclosure @ 30Hz, and 3.4dB loss at 25Hz, 3dB loss @35Hz... Heres tsp's for original vs new (china version) Old Version Re = 4.0107 ohms Fs = 22.4333 Hz Zmax = 52.5281 ohms Qes = 0.4130 Qms = 4.9959 Qts = 0.3815 Le = 1.9970 mH (at 1 kHz) Diam = 390.8425 mm ( 15.3875 in ) Sd =119975.7382 mm^2(185.9628 in^2) Vas = 188.3549 L ( 6.6517 ft^3) BL = 27.3490 N/A Mms = 546.4212 g Cms = 92.1140 uM/N Kms =10856.1182 N/M Rms = 15.4164 R mechanical Efficiency = 0.4838 % Sensitivity= 88.8647 dB @1W/1m New Version Re = 4.1115 ohms Fs = 21.8718 Hz Zmax = 82.0565 ohms Qes = 0.3752 Qms = 7.1129 Qts = 0.3564 Le = 2.4618 mH (at 1 kHz) Diam = 390.8425 mm ( 15.3875 in ) Sd =119975.7382 mm^2(185.9628 in^2) Vas = 192.8393 L ( 6.8101 ft^3) BL = 29.0781 N/A Mms = 561.4697 g Cms = 94.3070 uM/N Kms =10603.6641 N/M Rms = 10.8478 R mechanical Efficiency = 0.5053 % Sensitivity= 89.0534 dB @1W/1m Very efficient but lower Q than needed to be an authority subsonic, and not have a more than 1dB output deviation across its usable bandwidth. The LMS 4K 10 has a flatter bandwidth and can play much lower than the LMS 5400, just not with ridiculous output. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
TC Sounds
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list