Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
T/S Specs Released For New RE Woofers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AndonD454" data-source="post: 1602305" data-attributes="member: 560628"><p>im still curious about the 22mm xmax on the mx... i thought it was supposed to have a ton of excursion and that was part of the reason sd was sacrificed so much..</p><p></p><p>but now that i look at it the sd isnt different than any of the other subs (the sx has the least actually.. ) .. it just has the same xmax as the sx with a little more power handling.. but its less efficient? im confused still</p><p></p><p>EDIT: let this thread set the example for why not to drink heavily then post all over CA.com. sorry for the earlier thread dumping, and no hard feelings plotpimpin //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif (haha thansk for neutral reputation bubble)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AndonD454, post: 1602305, member: 560628"] im still curious about the 22mm xmax on the mx... i thought it was supposed to have a ton of excursion and that was part of the reason sd was sacrificed so much.. but now that i look at it the sd isnt different than any of the other subs (the sx has the least actually.. ) .. it just has the same xmax as the sx with a little more power handling.. but its less efficient? im confused still EDIT: let this thread set the example for why not to drink heavily then post all over CA.com. sorry for the earlier thread dumping, and no hard feelings plotpimpin [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] (haha thansk for neutral reputation bubble) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
T/S Specs Released For New RE Woofers
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
