is it just me or does oakland always make it seem like they are gonna lose? i mean, i just get this weird feeling when they go into big games that they are gonna lose...they NEED to win, yesOriginally posted by Brock Oakland needs to beat Tampa Bay...IMO
Ok, be a hater. They aren't my team, but they didn't get where they are by being a sshity team, and personaly I don't think that Oaklands defense will be able to stop them.Originally posted by snova031 God I hate Keyshawn. He's so loud and full of himself, he's dropped out of the elite wr's IMO. The guy is afraid to take a hit, I've never seen such a ***** on the field before. And Warren Sapp is a big piece of ****. All he talks about is how he's gonna break the sack record every year, what'd he have, 4 this year? Wow, what a great ****ing waste of space he is. Until he wins a SB, he needs to shut the **** up.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
WORD.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gifOriginally posted by SuckMikeHawk23 oakland has no running game whatsoever. they have a decent running back at best. sure he pulls off lots of long runs, but thats only cuz they keep the defense SOOOOO off balance making them think they're gonna pass every down, that he can get those every once in awhile, but if they do decide to actually run it against tampa (which they won't), tampa will stuff them every down. and u talk about gannon and his targets, but don't forget, this tampa defense is the best in the league. they got linebackers who can drop back in coverage (quarles, and brooks), and a safety (lynch) who doesnt allow ANY reciever to go up the middle of the field, and if someone does dare, they get the living hell knocked out of them. and their corners aren't too shabby either, you see that defensive performance barber showed against the eagles? i think the difference is gonna be brad johnson, if he can have a above par game, tampa wins, if he stinks it up, oakland takes it. i think brad will do well //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
Wow, a decent running back? Charlie Garner...hmmmm...2000 total yards this year, that only makes him decent though right? Garner could put up 1500 rushing yards if asked to, but he doesn't have to. Like I said, Oakland has too many threats. They have 3 #1 receivers, and a 90 catch running back. The Bucs have Brad Johnson. Thats it. Keyshawn won't run over the middle, he's afraid to break a nail, and their 2 running backs, Mike Allstot, and Michael Pittman, aren't much of a running force. If Oaklands offense plays like it can, I think this game will be a blowout. You say that the Bucs have the best d in the league, but you do know who has the best offense? Thats right, the Raiders. And have you seen Oaklands defense lately?Originally posted by SuckMikeHawk23 oakland has no running game whatsoever. they have a decent running back at best. sure he pulls off lots of long runs, but thats only cuz they keep the defense SOOOOO off balance making them think they're gonna pass every down, that he can get those every once in awhile, but if they do decide to actually run it against tampa (which they won't), tampa will stuff them every down. and u talk about gannon and his targets, but don't forget, this tampa defense is the best in the league. they got linebackers who can drop back in coverage (quarles, and brooks), and a safety (lynch) who doesnt allow ANY reciever to go up the middle of the field, and if someone does dare, they get the living hell knocked out of them. and their corners aren't too shabby either, you see that defensive performance barber showed against the eagles? i think the difference is gonna be brad johnson, if he can have a above par game, tampa wins, if he stinks it up, oakland takes it. i think brad will do well //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
garner is just a decent running back when it comes to the running game. however, he is one of the better recieving backs in the league, but as a running back, he can't put up 1500, sorry. sure they have 3 #1 recievers, but have u seen tampas secondary and what there linebackers can do? and about keyshawn not going through the middle, i disagree. he was afraid to when he was on the jets, but the first thing i noticed about him when he arrived in tampa was that he was running through the middle more often, and he continues to do so every game. sorry, can't agree with you on that. alstott and pittman do blow though, but alstott can be a force if he would just stop finding defensive players to plow through. in my opinion, oaklands offense only put up the numbers they did because they played really weak teams in the beginning of the season. the titans blew then, and so did pittsburgh. don't get my words twisted though, its a great oakland team, but that tampa d is just too good to let that offense be a force. my opinion on who is gonna win the game still depends on brad johnson.Originally posted by snova031 Wow, a decent running back? Charlie Garner...hmmmm...2000 total yards this year, that only makes him decent though right? Garner could put up 1500 rushing yards if asked to, but he doesn't have to. Like I said, Oakland has too many threats. They have 3 #1 receivers, and a 90 catch running back. The Bucs have Brad Johnson. Thats it. Keyshawn won't run over the middle, he's afraid to break a nail, and their 2 running backs, Mike Allstot, and Michael Pittman, aren't much of a running force. If Oaklands offense plays like it can, I think this game will be a blowout. You say that the Bucs have the best d in the league, but you do know who has the best offense? Thats right, the Raiders. And have you seen Oaklands defense lately?
you just contradicted yourself! you just said that the other team is off-balance cuz of the frequency of oaklands passing game, but that, in turn, makes their running effective! thats how they make their running game decent. they dont need to run, and they will be stupid to try it against TBOriginally posted by SuckMikeHawk23 oakland has no running game whatsoever. they have a decent running back at best. sure he pulls off lots of long runs, but thats only cuz they keep the defense SOOOOO off balance making them think they're gonna pass every down, that he can get those every once in awhile, but if they do decide to actually run it against tampa (which they won't), tampa will stuff them every down.
Give charlie garner 300+ carries w/ that offense, and you got yourself a 1500 yard running back.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif Keyshawn goes down before he takes a hit, just watch him catch a ball and watch a d-back come at him...he will fall to the turf to avoid it. Should be an interesting game though, but if Oak plays smart and utilizes all their offensive weapons, I think its an easy win.Originally posted by SuckMikeHawk23 garner is just a decent running back when it comes to the running game. however, he is one of the better recieving backs in the league, but as a running back, he can't put up 1500, sorry. sure they have 3 #1 recievers, but have u seen tampas secondary and what there linebackers can do? and about keyshawn not going through the middle, i disagree. he was afraid to when he was on the jets, but the first thing i noticed about him when he arrived in tampa was that he was running through the middle more often, and he continues to do so every game. sorry, can't agree with you on that. alstott and pittman do blow though, but alstott can be a force if he would just stop finding defensive players to plow through. in my opinion, oaklands offense only put up the numbers they did because they played really weak teams in the beginning of the season. the titans blew then, and so did pittsburgh. don't get my words twisted though, its a great oakland team, but that tampa d is just too good to let that offense be a force. my opinion on who is gonna win the game still depends on brad johnson.
thats not really a contradiction in the sense that 1 running play that pulls off 15-20 yards at the beginning of a game generally doesnt make much of a difference. it can, but it generally doesnt.Originally posted by nswartley you just contradicted yourself! you just said that the other team is off-balance cuz of the frequency of oaklands passing game, but that, in turn, makes their running effective! thats how they make their running game decent. they dont need to run, and they will be stupid to try it against TB