Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Sundown spl surround efficiency?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mrj858" data-source="post: 8717037" data-attributes="member: 634131"><p>I’ve run both surrounds on the same subs with only difference being surround difference....the “fat” surrounds don’t tighten up over stroke so they don’t introduce any suspension induced distortion...the “SPL” surrounds tighten up over stroke causing FS to raise causing a favorable sound in upper frequency’s (which is suspension induced distortion) and the main reason most people think the fat surrounds aren’t loud in the upper frequencies...the only difference I experienced in testing is with the “Fat” surrounds I gained output in the lower frequency range and with the</p><p>”SPL” surrounds I lost output in the lower frequency range giving the impression that I had more output in the upper frequencies</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mrj858, post: 8717037, member: 634131"] I’ve run both surrounds on the same subs with only difference being surround difference....the “fat” surrounds don’t tighten up over stroke so they don’t introduce any suspension induced distortion...the “SPL” surrounds tighten up over stroke causing FS to raise causing a favorable sound in upper frequency’s (which is suspension induced distortion) and the main reason most people think the fat surrounds aren’t loud in the upper frequencies...the only difference I experienced in testing is with the “Fat” surrounds I gained output in the lower frequency range and with the ”SPL” surrounds I lost output in the lower frequency range giving the impression that I had more output in the upper frequencies [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Sundown spl surround efficiency?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list