Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Depression" data-source="post: 489442" data-attributes="member: 549489">About 3 months ago while reading an article by a so-called Leader in high end car stereo system design I read something that seemed a no-brainer, yet I had never applied it to my system designs. Basically what increases your systems sound in SPL and SQ is the addition of speakers...NOT MORE POWER. I guess this is a battled topic but it is a fact that 400 watts on a pair of seperates will not be as loud or clean as 200 watts on 2 pairs of seperates...BUTDoes this theory apply to SUBS!!!I had teased the idea a long time ago of putting 4 8&quot; subs in the rear portion of my Extended cab, Yet in the 1990&#039;s Woofer size was the same as penis size and everyone demanded to go bigger. Recently I have noticed a swing towards MORE SUBS but at less inches? These Systems are high end and sound truly amazing.So after rambling..my question is&quot;Am I better of with 4 8 inch subs or 2 10&#039;s?&quot; and Why?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Depression, post: 489442, member: 549489"] About 3 months ago while reading an article by a so-called Leader in high end car stereo system design I read something that seemed a no-brainer, yet I had never applied it to my system designs. Basically what increases your systems sound in SPL and SQ is the addition of speakers...NOT MORE POWER. I guess this is a battled topic but it is a fact that 400 watts on a pair of seperates will not be as loud or clean as 200 watts on 2 pairs of seperates...BUT Does this theory apply to SUBS!!! I had teased the idea a long time ago of putting 4 8" subs in the rear portion of my Extended cab, Yet in the 1990's Woofer size was the same as penis size and everyone demanded to go bigger. Recently I have noticed a swing towards MORE SUBS but at less inches? These Systems are high end and sound truly amazing. So after rambling..my question is "Am I better of with 4 8 inch subs or 2 10's?" and Why? [/QUOTE]

Verification