Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Sub Material
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Electrodynamic" data-source="post: 430971" data-attributes="member: 548723"><p>Heh...this should be interesting.</p><p></p><p>Paper cones offers great effiency with so-so heat disipation. Aluminum cones offer average efficiency with great heat disipation capabilities. Poly offers average qualities of both. (I know I'm going to get reamed for this one)</p><p></p><p>Surrounds. Foam is more efficient. Rubber is less efficient. Foam has better stretching tendencies than rubber does. Santoprene is the best of both worlds - efficiency of foam with the "longevity" of rubber...even though the new foam surrounds are treated to last a LOT longer. However, santo. and rubber cavitate under extreme stress (AKA: severe SPL applications).</p><p></p><p>Basically you will find people / mfg's stressing one thing over the other because frankly, they use a certain product over the other for a given reason. I seriously doubt you will find a hardcore, dead-set, un-foulable cone/surround combo. It simply doesn't exist.</p><p></p><p>Now let the flaming begin. I have a feeling that what I've just posted will cause some people to become a bit perturbed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Electrodynamic, post: 430971, member: 548723"] Heh...this should be interesting. Paper cones offers great effiency with so-so heat disipation. Aluminum cones offer average efficiency with great heat disipation capabilities. Poly offers average qualities of both. (I know I'm going to get reamed for this one) Surrounds. Foam is more efficient. Rubber is less efficient. Foam has better stretching tendencies than rubber does. Santoprene is the best of both worlds - efficiency of foam with the "longevity" of rubber...even though the new foam surrounds are treated to last a LOT longer. However, santo. and rubber cavitate under extreme stress (AKA: severe SPL applications). Basically you will find people / mfg's stressing one thing over the other because frankly, they use a certain product over the other for a given reason. I seriously doubt you will find a hardcore, dead-set, un-foulable cone/surround combo. It simply doesn't exist. Now let the flaming begin. I have a feeling that what I've just posted will cause some people to become a bit perturbed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Sub Material
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list