Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
SS RL-s vs RE MX
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mrray13" data-source="post: 1733574" data-attributes="member: 540942"><p>80..the 139 was done at the headrest outlaw. just to see..it was done at 34hz as well. it did a 133 legal at the headrest.</p><p></p><p>yeah, with different tuning i believe we would have been well into the 40's....hell, putting the mic in the kick and going outlaw at 34hz would have put it in the 40's.</p><p></p><p>but hey...it was built for the lows, not the mic. the fact is, it did good on the mic. it's not a purpose built burp box. and don't forget the factory h/u. that probably hurt the score as much as anything.</p><p></p><p>mountaineer man...why shouldn't i doubt anyone who isn't me? and maybe you did do those numbers, but you don't say how or what mic. and it doesn't really matter anyway. the fact remains, most everything you say is in flame. you try to sound smart by instigating, not proving or providing.</p><p></p><p>and with that...</p><p></p><p>wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mrray13, post: 1733574, member: 540942"] 80..the 139 was done at the headrest outlaw. just to see..it was done at 34hz as well. it did a 133 legal at the headrest. yeah, with different tuning i believe we would have been well into the 40's....hell, putting the mic in the kick and going outlaw at 34hz would have put it in the 40's. but hey...it was built for the lows, not the mic. the fact is, it did good on the mic. it's not a purpose built burp box. and don't forget the factory h/u. that probably hurt the score as much as anything. mountaineer man...why shouldn't i doubt anyone who isn't me? and maybe you did do those numbers, but you don't say how or what mic. and it doesn't really matter anyway. the fact remains, most everything you say is in flame. you try to sound smart by instigating, not proving or providing. and with that... wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
SS RL-s vs RE MX
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list