Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mrray13" data-source="post: 1732287" data-attributes="member: 540942">yeah, i&#039;m sure you was. and the rl-s is a w7 killer. h2h it&#039;s far and away a better sub.with a bit of tweaking james herren (yeah street a 2004 world champ) thought we could break a 140. we didn&#039;t play with box placement or anything. put the mic on the glass, run a sweep, then burp. and don&#039;t forget, this is with a factory gm headunit. the bass signal gets weaker as the volume goes up. so given straight voltage, it would&#039;ve been a 140 fairly easy, IMO.and rl-i 8&#039;s aren&#039;t anything to sneeze at. especially the one i have in h/t use.but then again, it is you who are boasting. which is like lemans box building skills. pretty falking shabby.but enough of that...wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mrray13, post: 1732287, member: 540942"] yeah, i'm sure you was. and the rl-s is a w7 killer. h2h it's far and away a better sub. with a bit of tweaking james herren (yeah street a 2004 world champ) thought we could break a 140. we didn't play with box placement or anything. put the mic on the glass, run a sweep, then burp. and don't forget, this is with a factory gm headunit. the bass signal gets weaker as the volume goes up. so given straight voltage, it would've been a 140 fairly easy, IMO. and rl-i 8's aren't anything to sneeze at. especially the one i have in h/t use. but then again, it is you who are boasting. which is like lemans box building skills. pretty falking shabby. but enough of that... wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification