Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="donpisto" data-source="post: 5240959" data-attributes="member: 568577">//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gifI was disturbed by a post in another thread.&nbsp; I&#039;m not trying to say that a setup can not get loud and sound great at the same time.&nbsp; It most certainly can.Basically, what I&#039;m trying to get across is that people state they want an SQL sub.&nbsp; They want something that can get loud and will sound good and the MAJORITY of the people interested in &quot;SQL&quot; are only in for the setup to sound &quot;clean&quot;, which is not the ONLY factor of sound quality.But you&#039;re right, this sort of discussion is the type that will go back and forth and no definite answer, agreement, conclusion, or whatever, will come out of it.Crap, I just read the last paragraph of your post and realized that&#039;s sums up what I was trying to state.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="donpisto, post: 5240959, member: 568577"] [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif[/IMG] I was disturbed by a post in another thread. I'm not trying to say that a setup can not get loud and sound great at the same time. It most certainly can. Basically, what I'm trying to get across is that people state they want an SQL sub. They want something that can get loud and will sound good and the MAJORITY of the people interested in "SQL" are only in for the setup to sound "clean", which is not the ONLY factor of sound quality. But you're right, this sort of discussion is the type that will go back and forth and no definite answer, agreement, conclusion, or whatever, will come out of it. Crap, I just read the last paragraph of your post and realized that's sums up what I was trying to state. [/QUOTE]

Verification