Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
SQ..what is it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 6309848" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>So now you dont know the difference between the words "right" and "winning"?</p><p></p><p>Or, maybe, nobody else cares enough to comment/disagree with you. Or, they dont follow your logic to the point of not disagreeing. Or maybe they realize the level with which you apparently love to argue, and decided to exert their efforts otherwise. There are any number of reasons this is possible, yet you conclude it obviously means you 'conveyed your meaning properly' to everyone but me. A fancy way of saying you are right. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif And yes, you yet again trying to convince everyone Im just the most stupid person in this thread who doesn't get YOUR points only serves to show your goal here is not substance, but immature flaming.</p><p>Sarcastic oir not was hardly my point. My point was that since your very first comment here you have tried to do nothing but down me under the pretense of arguing my point. You would think someone who champions the idea of poor comprehension would be more careful than this.</p><p>Translation: you think you know what Im going to say, yet you were quite wrong. And you call me narcissistic. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif</p><p>Again, you only decided you were talking to a brick wall when I called you on getting serious about the topic. I wasn't a 'brick wall' when I was doing nothing but laying out sarcasm for you to portray as my inability to discuss this on a mature level with you.</p><p>More diatribe to imply you know me, or anything about me. Tell me, if you are so interested in a mature and rational debate, how does this comment fit into that? Again you met me with sarcasm, 'blatant' or not, that was less than friendly, rational, or respectful, from the very start. And yet here I am still willing to engage you on the topic. So you simply implying I am somehow the immature one here just because you say so, falls on deaf ears. I guess Im just flattered that Im apparently important enough to you to have been watching my comments enough to feel you can make such a general statement about me and my motives on this forum, while I really have no idea who you are. Or care. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wave.gif.002382ce7d7c19757ab945cc69819de1.gif</p><p>Regurgitating my comments with absolutely no evidence, or even personal opinion based comments, to back them up, only further shows your intent here appears not to be a rational discussion, but to turn this into a personal flame fest.</p><p>You stating you get my point over and over, does not diminish my examples that show you in fact do not. And again I find it amusing you did not decide I was not worth 'restating your point' only after you talked me into actually calling your bluff to have a reasonable discussion about the topic. Its worth your effort to come up with imaginary discussions with me based on your assumptions of what I know, how I feel, and what my motives are, in an attempt to make me look bad. But now all the sudden its no longer worth your effort to actually type out what you call your point one single solitary more time. I think this latest post from you shows you do feel this thread is worth putting effort into, based on the sheer size of your reply. but actually having a rational discussion on the topic is beneath you, your effort is only worth making sarcastic comments to try and defame me.</p><p>So you calling it a metaphor changes my point that you are now trying to get me to defend a position I never took? Argumentative, that's what it was.</p><p>If you want to discuss specifics, why not address the specifics I brought up, rather than make up your own and try to claim they are mine? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif</p><p>Again I stated that personal preference has its place, certainly. But to define it as "sound quality" is to remove accuracy, and render accuracy as undefined, while refusing to accept 'personal preference' as the proper term for a goal that revolves around a person's own desire to manipulate the sound to what they personally like. Any other made-up specifics you want to try and place in my words are simply you trying to dodge my real point, and replace it with one you feel you have a better chance of arguing against.</p><p></p><p>For anyone who is following this 'debate', which nobody probably is at this point, you just demonstrated what i said above, that you are too scared, apparently, to address my actual points, so make up ones of your own, and claim they are mine.</p><p>I didn't say you said purist, I said you were trying to portray me as one. Here, let me give an example...</p><p>Again you are so willing to argue with me at any cost, that you will come at me from any angle you can, even two opposing ones like first Im a purist, now Im a personal preference person. Can you not form a coherent and concise argument for me? Try harder. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif</p><p></p><p>Cast me in a negative light, no matter how nonsensical, right? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif You claim I ignored your point, when all you did was come up with some hypothetical discussion I had with... somebody... based on your assumptions of knowing me on a personal level. okay, here's me addressing your point... I wouldnt have said that, you were 100% wrong. Good enough for you now? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif</p><p>I really have to question your ability to follow me now. I was only acting 'beyond the conversation' when I was only giving sarcastic replies, which you didn't like and complained about. Now that Im willing to address you on the actual topic of the thread, you claim Im NOW acting like Im above the discussion. As for 'begging' you to continue? lol Now who is the one acting narcissistic? Pointing out that once I was willing to address you on the topic, you decided to stop replying, and only came back when I called you out by pointing out your hypocritical action, would only be "begging" to a narcissist. I guess the old saying is really true, the one who smelt it, dealt it. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 6309848, member: 549629"] So now you dont know the difference between the words "right" and "winning"? Or, maybe, nobody else cares enough to comment/disagree with you. Or, they dont follow your logic to the point of not disagreeing. Or maybe they realize the level with which you apparently love to argue, and decided to exert their efforts otherwise. There are any number of reasons this is possible, yet you conclude it obviously means you 'conveyed your meaning properly' to everyone but me. A fancy way of saying you are right. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif[/IMG] And yes, you yet again trying to convince everyone Im just the most stupid person in this thread who doesn't get YOUR points only serves to show your goal here is not substance, but immature flaming. Sarcastic oir not was hardly my point. My point was that since your very first comment here you have tried to do nothing but down me under the pretense of arguing my point. You would think someone who champions the idea of poor comprehension would be more careful than this. Translation: you think you know what Im going to say, yet you were quite wrong. And you call me narcissistic. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] Again, you only decided you were talking to a brick wall when I called you on getting serious about the topic. I wasn't a 'brick wall' when I was doing nothing but laying out sarcasm for you to portray as my inability to discuss this on a mature level with you. More diatribe to imply you know me, or anything about me. Tell me, if you are so interested in a mature and rational debate, how does this comment fit into that? Again you met me with sarcasm, 'blatant' or not, that was less than friendly, rational, or respectful, from the very start. And yet here I am still willing to engage you on the topic. So you simply implying I am somehow the immature one here just because you say so, falls on deaf ears. I guess Im just flattered that Im apparently important enough to you to have been watching my comments enough to feel you can make such a general statement about me and my motives on this forum, while I really have no idea who you are. Or care. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wave.gif.002382ce7d7c19757ab945cc69819de1.gif[/IMG] Regurgitating my comments with absolutely no evidence, or even personal opinion based comments, to back them up, only further shows your intent here appears not to be a rational discussion, but to turn this into a personal flame fest. You stating you get my point over and over, does not diminish my examples that show you in fact do not. And again I find it amusing you did not decide I was not worth 'restating your point' only after you talked me into actually calling your bluff to have a reasonable discussion about the topic. Its worth your effort to come up with imaginary discussions with me based on your assumptions of what I know, how I feel, and what my motives are, in an attempt to make me look bad. But now all the sudden its no longer worth your effort to actually type out what you call your point one single solitary more time. I think this latest post from you shows you do feel this thread is worth putting effort into, based on the sheer size of your reply. but actually having a rational discussion on the topic is beneath you, your effort is only worth making sarcastic comments to try and defame me. So you calling it a metaphor changes my point that you are now trying to get me to defend a position I never took? Argumentative, that's what it was. If you want to discuss specifics, why not address the specifics I brought up, rather than make up your own and try to claim they are mine? [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif[/IMG] Again I stated that personal preference has its place, certainly. But to define it as "sound quality" is to remove accuracy, and render accuracy as undefined, while refusing to accept 'personal preference' as the proper term for a goal that revolves around a person's own desire to manipulate the sound to what they personally like. Any other made-up specifics you want to try and place in my words are simply you trying to dodge my real point, and replace it with one you feel you have a better chance of arguing against. For anyone who is following this 'debate', which nobody probably is at this point, you just demonstrated what i said above, that you are too scared, apparently, to address my actual points, so make up ones of your own, and claim they are mine. I didn't say you said purist, I said you were trying to portray me as one. Here, let me give an example... Again you are so willing to argue with me at any cost, that you will come at me from any angle you can, even two opposing ones like first Im a purist, now Im a personal preference person. Can you not form a coherent and concise argument for me? Try harder. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] Cast me in a negative light, no matter how nonsensical, right? [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif[/IMG] You claim I ignored your point, when all you did was come up with some hypothetical discussion I had with... somebody... based on your assumptions of knowing me on a personal level. okay, here's me addressing your point... I wouldnt have said that, you were 100% wrong. Good enough for you now? [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif[/IMG] I really have to question your ability to follow me now. I was only acting 'beyond the conversation' when I was only giving sarcastic replies, which you didn't like and complained about. Now that Im willing to address you on the actual topic of the thread, you claim Im NOW acting like Im above the discussion. As for 'begging' you to continue? lol Now who is the one acting narcissistic? Pointing out that once I was willing to address you on the topic, you decided to stop replying, and only came back when I called you out by pointing out your hypocritical action, would only be "begging" to a narcissist. I guess the old saying is really true, the one who smelt it, dealt it. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
SQ..what is it?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
