Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
SQ..what is it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ctesibius" data-source="post: 6309744" data-attributes="member: 564131"><p>This isn't about being "right", remember //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif</p><p></p><p>I didn't say it made me "right", I said my explanations were apparently sufficient to convey my point to everyone except you.</p><p></p><p></p><p>OMFG are you kidding me? It wasn't <strong>blatantly</strong> obvious that my post there was sarcastic tongue-in-cheek comment? You either have some serious paranoia issues, or a very poor sarcasm detector.</p><p></p><p><a href="http:////forum/showpost.php?p=6525867&amp;postcount=85" target="_blank">http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showpost.php?p=6525867&amp;postcount=85</a></p><p></p><p>But wait, let me save you the time. In an event reminiscent of Eminem in 8 Mile, let me disspell in advance some of the nonsense you are going to proclaim. You will probably come back and tell me that it was a serious comment portrayed as sarcasm to avoid overt confrontation. Which I would hope given my other postings one could see as being not my personality type. You might also try to say that it was not sarcasm at all, but rather my initiation of an argument with you as my entire goal is to flame you and am only now claiming sarcasm to avoid being detected as a flamer. Again, you might have noticed this does not fit my personality. So save the nonsense and take it for what it is......a tongue-in-cheek comment that I posted as I was sitting here bored and thought it would be an interesting play on words.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, I did. Talking to a brick wall has never been something that kept me engaged in a topic.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh, trust me, you're postings speak volumes to everyone aswell //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif</p><p></p><p>I suppose I could make an exception in this case and instead take the road you have so often traveled.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, I do understand your point. You, however, do not understand mine as clearly stated in this thread in multiple different posts. I'm not restating it for the fifth time.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It was a metaphor which is apparently completely lost on you. I'm sorry it is apparently behind your ability to relate.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, I am cornering you into specifics in order to display the flaw in your plan. If we can't use terms like "sound quality" to describe general preferences, how exactly do you propose we describe said personal preferences? If you can't offer any further guidance in this area, then your position has zero meaning or relevance.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I just demonstrated that I am following with your point, as evidenced by the above question I posed that you are unable to answer.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I didn't say you were a purist, I said you have an egotistical, narcissistic personality.</p><p></p><p></p><p>While part of the adjectives there very well may be fitting, you didn't seem to comment on the point I was making.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I've been yawning on this topic for the past few days, hence my lack of response. Yet now you try to come back and pretend that you are beyond the conversation and I'm lacking a rational discussion when I've already abandoned it once and you essentially begged me to continue it. Yeah, that is fantastically logical.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ctesibius, post: 6309744, member: 564131"] This isn't about being "right", remember [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif[/IMG] I didn't say it made me "right", I said my explanations were apparently sufficient to convey my point to everyone except you. OMFG are you kidding me? It wasn't [B]blatantly[/B] obvious that my post there was sarcastic tongue-in-cheek comment? You either have some serious paranoia issues, or a very poor sarcasm detector. [URL="http:////forum/showpost.php?p=6525867&postcount=85"]http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showpost.php?p=6525867&postcount=85[/URL] But wait, let me save you the time. In an event reminiscent of Eminem in 8 Mile, let me disspell in advance some of the nonsense you are going to proclaim. You will probably come back and tell me that it was a serious comment portrayed as sarcasm to avoid overt confrontation. Which I would hope given my other postings one could see as being not my personality type. You might also try to say that it was not sarcasm at all, but rather my initiation of an argument with you as my entire goal is to flame you and am only now claiming sarcasm to avoid being detected as a flamer. Again, you might have noticed this does not fit my personality. So save the nonsense and take it for what it is......a tongue-in-cheek comment that I posted as I was sitting here bored and thought it would be an interesting play on words. Yes, I did. Talking to a brick wall has never been something that kept me engaged in a topic. Oh, trust me, you're postings speak volumes to everyone aswell [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif[/IMG] I suppose I could make an exception in this case and instead take the road you have so often traveled. Yes, I do understand your point. You, however, do not understand mine as clearly stated in this thread in multiple different posts. I'm not restating it for the fifth time. It was a metaphor which is apparently completely lost on you. I'm sorry it is apparently behind your ability to relate. Yes, I am cornering you into specifics in order to display the flaw in your plan. If we can't use terms like "sound quality" to describe general preferences, how exactly do you propose we describe said personal preferences? If you can't offer any further guidance in this area, then your position has zero meaning or relevance. I just demonstrated that I am following with your point, as evidenced by the above question I posed that you are unable to answer. I didn't say you were a purist, I said you have an egotistical, narcissistic personality. While part of the adjectives there very well may be fitting, you didn't seem to comment on the point I was making. I've been yawning on this topic for the past few days, hence my lack of response. Yet now you try to come back and pretend that you are beyond the conversation and I'm lacking a rational discussion when I've already abandoned it once and you essentially begged me to continue it. Yeah, that is fantastically logical. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
SQ..what is it?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
