Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
SQ..what is it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="req" data-source="post: 6291414" data-attributes="member: 555713"><p>alright noobcakes. this is the awnser:</p><p></p><p>sound quality is defined as fidelity.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidelity" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidelity</a></p><p></p><p>fidelity is solely based on the idea that the original recording (after it is mixed ect,) is reproduced as close as possible when it is reproduced on another stereo. this means, however the mixer or recording was made - meaning instruments on the sound stage ect, should be exactly as it was done when it was created.</p><p></p><p>things are currently done mostly digitally with something like protools or the equivalent. one should be able to place the stereo in a anechoic chamber and record the music and be able to directly compare the recording to the original recording with almost no difference.</p><p></p><p>this is sound quality. the accurate and precise reproduction of the original recording. this is fact, there is no opinion on this.</p><p></p><p>as far as imaging and stage height, it should take common sense to realize that the recording was made with stereo panning and instrument placement. this should also inherently be recreated just because the play back is identical to the recording. as far as stage height goes - it is also common sense that we stand in front of a musician as music is played. ive never seen anyone who faces the same direction as the musician. so that is common sense as well.</p><p></p><p>none of this is subjective. none of this is something anyone is required to do. but this is not an argument. it is fact, sound quality is a high fidelity play back of the original recording, regardless of how the recording was made or who made it or what they wanted it to sound like... obviously they made it sound good or you would not be listening to it and that is the point, MUSIC is subjective. what you enjoy listening to is YOUR opinion, but sound quality is not your opinion. this is a totally different subject.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="req, post: 6291414, member: 555713"] alright noobcakes. this is the awnser: sound quality is defined as fidelity. [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidelity"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidelity[/URL] fidelity is solely based on the idea that the original recording (after it is mixed ect,) is reproduced as close as possible when it is reproduced on another stereo. this means, however the mixer or recording was made - meaning instruments on the sound stage ect, should be exactly as it was done when it was created. things are currently done mostly digitally with something like protools or the equivalent. one should be able to place the stereo in a anechoic chamber and record the music and be able to directly compare the recording to the original recording with almost no difference. this is sound quality. the accurate and precise reproduction of the original recording. this is fact, there is no opinion on this. as far as imaging and stage height, it should take common sense to realize that the recording was made with stereo panning and instrument placement. this should also inherently be recreated just because the play back is identical to the recording. as far as stage height goes - it is also common sense that we stand in front of a musician as music is played. ive never seen anyone who faces the same direction as the musician. so that is common sense as well. none of this is subjective. none of this is something anyone is required to do. but this is not an argument. it is fact, sound quality is a high fidelity play back of the original recording, regardless of how the recording was made or who made it or what they wanted it to sound like... obviously they made it sound good or you would not be listening to it and that is the point, MUSIC is subjective. what you enjoy listening to is YOUR opinion, but sound quality is not your opinion. this is a totally different subject. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
SQ..what is it?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
