Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
SQ System
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="helotaxi" data-source="post: 1911297" data-attributes="member: 550915"><p>First, you probably don't want the Japanese model of a HU if you ever listen to the radio. The freq range is different. You will have a range of radio freqs that you don't need and there is part of the radio spectrum here that you can't tune in.</p><p></p><p>Second, do you have room for 2 6.5" woofers on each side up front? If not, I would suggest the 265.25 instead of the 465.25.</p><p></p><p>Are you planning on running an active crossover or the passive that comes with the comp set. If you are using the passive unit I would go with the Arc 2100. It will give you a bit more power. Of course if you were to go with the 465 set, the 4150 would let you go active and have 160W for each side on the midbasses and 80W for the tweets in an active setup (crossover in the amp).</p><p></p><p>The component choice looks good. The install will make it or break it of course. Don't forget to budget in wiring and electrical upgrades to feed the amps. It would be a shame to have great stuff and a good install and not have the juice to run it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="helotaxi, post: 1911297, member: 550915"] First, you probably don't want the Japanese model of a HU if you ever listen to the radio. The freq range is different. You will have a range of radio freqs that you don't need and there is part of the radio spectrum here that you can't tune in. Second, do you have room for 2 6.5" woofers on each side up front? If not, I would suggest the 265.25 instead of the 465.25. Are you planning on running an active crossover or the passive that comes with the comp set. If you are using the passive unit I would go with the Arc 2100. It will give you a bit more power. Of course if you were to go with the 465 set, the 4150 would let you go active and have 160W for each side on the midbasses and 80W for the tweets in an active setup (crossover in the amp). The component choice looks good. The install will make it or break it of course. Don't forget to budget in wiring and electrical upgrades to feed the amps. It would be a shame to have great stuff and a good install and not have the juice to run it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
SQ System
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list