Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Soundsplinter VS. Dayton
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JimJ" data-source="post: 1333040" data-attributes="member: 555251"><p>I would say HT application is the only use that makes any shred of sense for the Supreme series. That being said, I agree with hayden in thinking that "excursion at all cost" is <strong>not</strong> the way to build the best driver. Too many compromises must be made (Qts in the .9 range, anyone? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif )</p><p></p><p>As far as bass response, I doubt the RL-s is really that much better than a pair of RL-p 15"'s in a low tuned bass reflex enclosure, with much more reasonable amplification and enclosure specs //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif</p><p></p><p>But this is pretty much OT anyway...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JimJ, post: 1333040, member: 555251"] I would say HT application is the only use that makes any shred of sense for the Supreme series. That being said, I agree with hayden in thinking that "excursion at all cost" is [B]not[/B] the way to build the best driver. Too many compromises must be made (Qts in the .9 range, anyone? [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif[/IMG] ) As far as bass response, I doubt the RL-s is really that much better than a pair of RL-p 15"'s in a low tuned bass reflex enclosure, with much more reasonable amplification and enclosure specs [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] But this is pretty much OT anyway... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Soundsplinter VS. Dayton
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
