Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Soundqubed hds3 vs jl audio w7
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Papermaker85" data-source="post: 8495047" data-attributes="member: 572595"><p>[quote name='Boomin_tahoe']I could give 2 ***** over stiffness vs. how the sub performs in a good designed ported enclosure.</p><p></p><p>Why don&#39;t we call upon an expert [USER=549523]@sundownz[/USER]. I think he did a head to head comparison between the JL W sub and his X version some time ago.</p></blockquote><p></p><p>im explanining to you why the z and the w7 are more similar. lol</p><p>im not knocking ether sub. the sd is designed to be ported the w7 sealed. the only downfall is the sd takes alot more power to get louder in the same alignment. sealed the z will outdisplace it and evetually get louder but the w7 is really made to be sealed..</p><p>in a few short weeks.</p><p>im supposted to get scared? i dont knock sundown or jacob. if he wants to say something he is welcome to. he will just tell you the same thing i just said. its simply a matter of physics. if the op has 1000-1200 the w7 is a better choice if he has 1500 up the z is a no branier. i hate jl btw because us so overpriced imo. but im not going to be baised and give a recommendation based of one aspect...</p><p>good day turtle..</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Papermaker85, post: 8495047, member: 572595"] [quote name='Boomin_tahoe']I could give 2 ***** over stiffness vs. how the sub performs in a good designed ported enclosure. Why don't we call upon an expert [USER=549523]@sundownz[/USER]. I think he did a head to head comparison between the JL W sub and his X version some time ago.[/QUOTE] im explanining to you why the z and the w7 are more similar. lol im not knocking ether sub. the sd is designed to be ported the w7 sealed. the only downfall is the sd takes alot more power to get louder in the same alignment. sealed the z will outdisplace it and evetually get louder but the w7 is really made to be sealed.. in a few short weeks. im supposted to get scared? i dont knock sundown or jacob. if he wants to say something he is welcome to. he will just tell you the same thing i just said. its simply a matter of physics. if the op has 1000-1200 the w7 is a better choice if he has 1500 up the z is a no branier. i hate jl btw because us so overpriced imo. but im not going to be baised and give a recommendation based of one aspect... good day turtle.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Soundqubed hds3 vs jl audio w7
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh