Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="neo_styles" data-source="post: 8154353" data-attributes="member: 644168">This thread is seriously going to fvck up some noobs&#039; basic understanding on sub stage output in CA.Look, Mr. Notre Dame, your logic is flawed. Saying the lower volume of a car&#039;s interior space will cause less volume to be pressurized and therefore increase the sound pressure in that space is true, but what you&#039;re doing is jumping to conclusions and saying that AUTOMATICALLY means more flex, which is flat out wrong. Flex is the enemy in this scenario since all you&#039;re doing is acoustically exciting the metal in the car&#039;s body which will lead to cancelation and...LESS output. This is why you deaden. This is why you brace. It&#039;s not just for the car&#039;s protection.So you&#039;re trying to tell me that if you had the same system in a &#039;79 Celebrity Classic wagon and a Dodge Magnum (assuming volumes are equal), then the Magnum would be louder due to more flex? Think again.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="neo_styles, post: 8154353, member: 644168"] This thread is seriously going to fvck up some noobs' basic understanding on sub stage output in CA. Look, Mr. Notre Dame, your logic is flawed. Saying the lower volume of a car's interior space will cause less volume to be pressurized and therefore increase the sound pressure in that space is true, but what you're doing is jumping to conclusions and saying that AUTOMATICALLY means more flex, which is flat out wrong. Flex is the enemy in this scenario since all you're doing is acoustically exciting the metal in the car's body which will lead to cancelation and...LESS output. This is why you deaden. This is why you brace. It's not just for the car's protection. So you're trying to tell me that if you had the same system in a '79 Celebrity Classic wagon and a Dodge Magnum (assuming volumes are equal), then the Magnum would be louder due to more flex? Think again. [/QUOTE]

Verification