Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="helotaxi" data-source="post: 361601" data-attributes="member: 550915">Does daddy know you are using his computer?For this rot coming from your keyboard to be considered fact, you would have to be correct in at least one thing you say and be able to back it up with SCIENTIFIC evidence.&nbsp; You can&#039;t.&nbsp; One subjective example based on conditions that could never be considered unbiased does not equal facts.&nbsp; Fact:&nbsp; Acoustics can be explained and predicted using equations.&nbsp; Fact:&nbsp; Loudspeaker performance in a given enclosure can be explained and predicted using equations.I&#039;ve been in this post from the beginning.&nbsp; So you own some nice equipment.&nbsp; That makes you the expert?&nbsp; I own an axe.&nbsp; I&#039;m the worlds foremost expert on lumberjacking.&nbsp; The only thing hard is your head at this point.&nbsp; You think the people on this forum only talk from their butt about something they&#039;ve never done/seen/experienced.&nbsp; I&#039;ll wager there are people on this forum that have being doing this since you were in grade school.So you&#039;re Einstein now, huh?&nbsp; You know the big difference between you and Einstein?&nbsp; Einstein was ahead of his time and discussing things that had never been thought of before.&nbsp; You are just disagreeing with years of scientific research with nothing to back it up other than you less than scientific &quot;experiment.&quot;&nbsp; You gonna argue with Ohm&#039;s Law next?&nbsp; How about Newton?The only fool is this thread is you (well, and DBFan, but that&#039;s a different story <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /> just messin with ya DB).&nbsp; You are presented with hard scientific FACT that has been exhaustively researched, and you dismiss it because you don&#039;t like what it says.Um...a lot of the SQ judges are musicians.&nbsp; A lot of guys behind production boards have no clue what quality sound is.&nbsp; Any monkey can move some sliders around.&nbsp; Does the result sound like it really did in the studio?&nbsp; Doubtful.&nbsp; Rap producers are the worst of the lot.&nbsp; Get them to &quot;produce&quot; an album of music that actually has instruments and the musicians will kill them cause they will mess it up.OK here is the answer you don&#039;t want to hear.&nbsp; A good sub in a properly designed sealed enclosure will have no problem whatsoever in reproducing whatever is on the recording that is used as source material in the car environment.&nbsp; It will not PRODUCE -boom- which you seem to see as a detriment but which is the highest compliment you could be paying to the SQ aspect of the woofer.&nbsp; It plays what is there and doesn&#039;t play what isn&#039;t there.Finish school.&nbsp; Actually pay attention.&nbsp; Gain some knowlege.&nbsp; Gain some wisdom.&nbsp; Know when to admit you don&#039;t have the faintest idea what you are going on about and shut up.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="helotaxi, post: 361601, member: 550915"] Does daddy know you are using his computer? For this rot coming from your keyboard to be considered fact, you would have to be correct in at least one thing you say and be able to back it up with SCIENTIFIC evidence. You can't. One subjective example based on conditions that could never be considered unbiased does not equal facts. Fact: Acoustics can be explained and predicted using equations. Fact: Loudspeaker performance in a given enclosure can be explained and predicted using equations. I've been in this post from the beginning. So you own some nice equipment. That makes you the expert? I own an axe. I'm the worlds foremost expert on lumberjacking. The only thing hard is your head at this point. You think the people on this forum only talk from their butt about something they've never done/seen/experienced. I'll wager there are people on this forum that have being doing this since you were in grade school. So you're Einstein now, huh? You know the big difference between you and Einstein? Einstein was ahead of his time and discussing things that had never been thought of before. You are just disagreeing with years of scientific research with nothing to back it up other than you less than scientific "experiment." You gonna argue with Ohm's Law next? How about Newton? The only fool is this thread is you (well, and DBFan, but that's a different story :p just messin with ya DB). You are presented with hard scientific FACT that has been exhaustively researched, and you dismiss it because you don't like what it says. Um...a lot of the SQ judges are musicians. A lot of guys behind production boards have no clue what quality sound is. Any monkey can move some sliders around. Does the result sound like it really did in the studio? Doubtful. Rap producers are the worst of the lot. Get them to "produce" an album of music that actually has instruments and the musicians will kill them cause they will mess it up. OK here is the answer you don't want to hear. A good sub in a properly designed sealed enclosure will have no problem whatsoever in reproducing whatever is on the recording that is used as source material in the car environment. It will not PRODUCE -boom- which you seem to see as a detriment but which is the highest compliment you could be paying to the SQ aspect of the woofer. It plays what is there and doesn't play what isn't there. Finish school. Actually pay attention. Gain some knowlege. Gain some wisdom. Know when to admit you don't have the faintest idea what you are going on about and shut up. [/QUOTE]

Verification