Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="squeak9798" data-source="post: 2975646" data-attributes="member: 555320">Honestly you are arguing semantics.Even using your figures (which if you have any actual data to support, I would be interested in seeing) I would consider 20% to be little, as I stated.&nbsp; Since for some odd reason people on forums like to describe a sub&#039;s output and sound quality attributes using percentages; If you said a sub had &quot;80% SPL and 20% SQ&quot;, how would you likely describe it&#039;s accuracy?&nbsp; You would probably say it had little accuracy.Yes, mat deadeners are going to reduce structural noise and are going to have the ability to block some noise/frequencies entering the cabin.It&#039;s barrier loading properties are relatively poor, especially compared to something designed to function in that capacity (such as foams).&nbsp; If you are wanting to absorb sound and combat airborne noise, mat is not going to be very effective.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="squeak9798, post: 2975646, member: 555320"] Honestly you are arguing semantics. Even using your figures (which if you have any actual data to support, I would be interested in seeing) I would consider 20% to be [I]little[/I], as I stated. Since for some odd reason people on forums like to describe a sub's output and sound quality attributes using percentages; If you said a sub had "80% SPL and 20% SQ", how would you likely describe it's accuracy? You would probably say it had [I]little[/I] accuracy. Yes, mat deadeners are going to reduce structural noise and are going to have the ability to block some noise/frequencies entering the cabin. It's barrier loading properties are relatively poor, especially compared to something designed to function in that capacity (such as foams). If you are wanting to absorb sound and combat airborne noise, mat is not going to be very effective. [/QUOTE]

Verification