Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lil Poot" data-source="post: 5202780" data-attributes="member: 561892">we get what you&#039;re saying, it sucks that cd player doesnt do what you want it to do. sounds like you need a new one if thats what you&#039;re after.what we&#039;re sayin is that 64kbps is not even close to being good enough for a car environment. granted, the worse your speakers are, the harder it is to hear a difference. i dont know, maybe on some 20 yr old blown stock speakers, it sounds fine to you, but the fact of the matter is anyone with an upgraded system, which is going to be basically anyone on this site is going to hear the low quality in something with that low of a bitrate.you can think what you want, tell us we&#039;re anal retentive audiophiles and that its all in our heads, but if i sat you in my truck, had 2 versions of the same song, 64k and 196k (which isnt even as high a quality as i normally like) played them back to back, you&#039;d hear a massive difference you wouldnt be able to deny.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lil Poot, post: 5202780, member: 561892"] we get what you're saying, it sucks that cd player doesnt do what you want it to do. sounds like you need a new one if thats what you're after. what we're sayin is that 64kbps is not even close to being good enough for a car environment. granted, the worse your speakers are, the harder it is to hear a difference. i dont know, maybe on some 20 yr old blown stock speakers, it sounds fine to you, but the fact of the matter is anyone with an upgraded system, which is going to be basically anyone on this site is going to hear the low quality in something with that low of a bitrate. you can think what you want, tell us we're anal retentive audiophiles and that its all in our heads, but if i sat you in my truck, had 2 versions of the same song, 64k and 196k (which isnt even as high a quality as i normally like) played them back to back, you'd hear a massive difference you wouldnt be able to deny. [/QUOTE]

Verification