Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mrray13" data-source="post: 561759" data-attributes="member: 540942">like said above.....the mobile es line of amps and h/u&#039;s are indeed worth the money (even the xlpod mobile es which they did make towards the end of the es life)...the speakers and subs are way below par...as is the regular (current) xplod amps...example...i am currently running a 10&quot; memphis hpo off a memphis pr140 which is rated 70 wrms x1 @4 ohm...recently i tried a sony 1600 watt peak mono amp...and didn&#039;t gain anything. it was rated 500 x1 @ 4 ohm and it wasn&#039;t noticeably louder at all. as a matter of fact, the memphis actually &quot;played&quot; lower then the sony. it was definitely cleaner.but for a budget and considering ur running a pyle sub..the sony oughta be fine.wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mrray13, post: 561759, member: 540942"] like said above.....the mobile es line of amps and h/u's are indeed worth the money (even the xlpod mobile es which they did make towards the end of the es life)...the speakers and subs are way below par...as is the regular (current) xplod amps... example... i am currently running a 10" memphis hpo off a memphis pr140 which is rated 70 wrms x1 @4 ohm...recently i tried a sony 1600 watt peak mono amp...and didn't gain anything. it was rated 500 x1 @ 4 ohm and it wasn't noticeably louder at all. as a matter of fact, the memphis actually "played" lower then the sony. it was definitely cleaner. but for a budget and considering ur running a pyle sub..the sony oughta be fine. wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification