Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Some of the best SQ subs ever made..?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zako" data-source="post: 7991522" data-attributes="member: 629735"><p>In my language "smooth bass sound" is when you have reasonably smooth frequency response, so that none of the frequencies is overbearing. This is more of a function of box design and/or tuning equalizer than specific subwoofer. Next, "full sound" is the opposite of "not full". When sound is not "full" then something is missing, as in a hole in frequency response, say at a certain frequency range. Again, this is a function of tuning and careful integration work. If these things are a function of tuning, then what part of SQ is subwoofer responsible for? Probably distortion and transient response. You want subwoofer to have as little non-linear distortion as possible. Next, you want the subwoofer to have good transient response, so it can respond well to transients.</p><p></p><p>Judging by popularity of SQ subs on DIYMA, these have very good reputation: Image Dynamics IDQv3 and IDMAXv3 (soon v4), Arc Audio Arc, Arc Audio Black, JL W6, W7, JBL WGTI, Morel Ultimo, Morel Ultimo SC, Stereo Integrity, Peerless XXLS, Scanspeak Discovery (XXLS clone), Boston Acoustics subs (G5 in particular), Aura subwoofers, and probably many others.. These are just the most popular ones, there exist many others of course.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zako, post: 7991522, member: 629735"] In my language "smooth bass sound" is when you have reasonably smooth frequency response, so that none of the frequencies is overbearing. This is more of a function of box design and/or tuning equalizer than specific subwoofer. Next, "full sound" is the opposite of "not full". When sound is not "full" then something is missing, as in a hole in frequency response, say at a certain frequency range. Again, this is a function of tuning and careful integration work. If these things are a function of tuning, then what part of SQ is subwoofer responsible for? Probably distortion and transient response. You want subwoofer to have as little non-linear distortion as possible. Next, you want the subwoofer to have good transient response, so it can respond well to transients. Judging by popularity of SQ subs on DIYMA, these have very good reputation: Image Dynamics IDQv3 and IDMAXv3 (soon v4), Arc Audio Arc, Arc Audio Black, JL W6, W7, JBL WGTI, Morel Ultimo, Morel Ultimo SC, Stereo Integrity, Peerless XXLS, Scanspeak Discovery (XXLS clone), Boston Acoustics subs (G5 in particular), Aura subwoofers, and probably many others.. These are just the most popular ones, there exist many others of course. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Some of the best SQ subs ever made..?
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh