Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Moble Enclosurs" data-source="post: 7794624" data-attributes="member: 634917">Sure thing man //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif. Keep in mind that optimum and personal preference are two different things, so the best bet for dimensions would be to have it designed within a given parameter first, to see how small you can actually go without losing too much output or efficiency and/or causing possible noise issues in the process. You can tune a box to say, 30Hz, or 25Hz, all day long but this does not account for the needed minimum volume of the port characteristics either, so make sure that within those dimensions you can fit the insides of the actual enclosure in there without increasing those noise factors while maintaining a requested tuning, response, and control of the sub(s).Best thing would be to take a max possible dimensional space and work within it to figure for what would optimally work for you. Also remember, that optimism is not just based on a free field measurement, that it can revolve around dimensional limitations, so don&#039;t get those confused with each other if you find that they require more than you have to offer for volume. You can &quot;optimize&quot; any enclosure within a given volume. Its just a matter of it being functional or not within certain limitations.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Moble Enclosurs, post: 7794624, member: 634917"] Sure thing man [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif[/IMG]. Keep in mind that optimum and personal preference are two different things, so the best bet for dimensions would be to have it designed within a given parameter first, to see how small you can actually go without losing too much output or efficiency and/or causing possible noise issues in the process. You can tune a box to say, 30Hz, or 25Hz, all day long but this does not account for the needed minimum volume of the port characteristics either, so make sure that within those dimensions you can fit the insides of the actual enclosure in there without increasing those noise factors while maintaining a requested tuning, response, and control of the sub(s). Best thing would be to take a max possible dimensional space and work within it to figure for what would optimally work for you. Also remember, that optimism is not just based on a free field measurement, that it can revolve around dimensional limitations, so don't get those confused with each other if you find that they require more than you have to offer for volume. You can "optimize" any enclosure within a given volume. Its just a matter of it being functional or not within certain limitations. [/QUOTE]

Verification