Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Shitty attempt at an EDU thread...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Immacomputer" data-source="post: 2705349" data-attributes="member: 570419"><p>I would like to know how they came to their conclusions. It's not logical at all. My way is much more logical and correct. I don't know what CAJ (car audio junkies??) is but the people over there are wrong. That's all there is to it. It won't change tuning much (maybe 1hz or so) unless the port is pretty wide. In some cases, you could be adding up to 3 or more inches to the port length which could possibly be a rather significant change in tuning.</p><p></p><p>Here is a little bit about end correction from JL:</p><p></p><p><em>"The effective length of the port is found by adding an end correction factor. An end correction factor is necesary because more often than not, one wall of the port is also one wall of the enclosure and this wall extends beyond the end of the port thus effectively adding length to the port (remember, the driver can't "see" the length of the port, it can only go by what it "feels" is going on)."</em></p><p></p><p><a href="http://mobile.jlaudio.com/support_pages.php?page_id=165" target="_blank">http://mobile.jlaudio.com/support_pages.php?page_id=165</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Immacomputer, post: 2705349, member: 570419"] I would like to know how they came to their conclusions. It's not logical at all. My way is much more logical and correct. I don't know what CAJ (car audio junkies??) is but the people over there are wrong. That's all there is to it. It won't change tuning much (maybe 1hz or so) unless the port is pretty wide. In some cases, you could be adding up to 3 or more inches to the port length which could possibly be a rather significant change in tuning. Here is a little bit about end correction from JL: [I]"The effective length of the port is found by adding an end correction factor. An end correction factor is necesary because more often than not, one wall of the port is also one wall of the enclosure and this wall extends beyond the end of the port thus effectively adding length to the port (remember, the driver can't "see" the length of the port, it can only go by what it "feels" is going on)."[/I] [URL="http://mobile.jlaudio.com/support_pages.php?page_id=165"]http://mobile.jlaudio.com/support_pages.php?page_id=165[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Shitty attempt at an EDU thread...
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list