Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Selling items idea
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Prowler573" data-source="post: 1927407" data-attributes="member: 561023"><p>Actually, my Mustang-flogging friend, that is exactly what we are proposing ~ withholding the funds from a questionable seller until the buyer can verify that whatever it is they purchased is as-advertised. "Approval" is a very subjective thing and there's really no way to police that as Buyer's Remorse is sometimes an incredibly powerful force. All we would require is that the item is in the same shape that is was described to be in within the FS thread offering it for sale in the first place. If the buyer feels that there are gross discrepencies between the shape it was advertised to be in and the condition the item is actually found to be in then the 3rd party would have to be provided with proof of those differences. This would be in an attempt to side-step the Buyer's Remorse that I previously mentioned. If a buyer receives a product and for some reason changed their mind while the item was in transit or once they actually take possession of it then no fault can be attributed to the seller for that and consequently the seller should not be penalized for that in any way. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Prowler573, post: 1927407, member: 561023"] Actually, my Mustang-flogging friend, that is exactly what we are proposing ~ withholding the funds from a questionable seller until the buyer can verify that whatever it is they purchased is as-advertised. "Approval" is a very subjective thing and there's really no way to police that as Buyer's Remorse is sometimes an incredibly powerful force. All we would require is that the item is in the same shape that is was described to be in within the FS thread offering it for sale in the first place. If the buyer feels that there are gross discrepencies between the shape it was advertised to be in and the condition the item is actually found to be in then the 3rd party would have to be provided with proof of those differences. This would be in an attempt to side-step the Buyer's Remorse that I previously mentioned. If a buyer receives a product and for some reason changed their mind while the item was in transit or once they actually take possession of it then no fault can be attributed to the seller for that and consequently the seller should not be penalized for that in any way. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Selling items idea
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list