Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Speakers
Running Image Dynamics CTX65CS Active (Power Handling)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zako" data-source="post: 7549713" data-attributes="member: 629735"><p>I don't know what's the best way to do it, but Y splitter should be fine. I personally do not use a Y splitter. So my front pre-amp connects to the amplifier and then to the tweeters (with a capacitor inline to act as a crossover). My rear pre-amp connects to the other 2 channels on the same amplifier and then those channels power the woofers. The reason I did it this way so I were able to apply time alignment from my Kenwood head unit to tweeters and woofers independently from each other. This was one of the two motivations for me two switch to active (the other was to match levels better). Being able to time align each driver individually made a pretty big difference in SQ compared to the results with TA applied to passive component sets, and I haven't even tried to more "formal" ways of tuning TA yet (using pink noise, etc).</p><p></p><p>So my "fader control" is now just a level control between tweeters and woofers, but I prefer to leave it at middle position, and tune amplifier gains instead. This means that I can't adjust my rear speaker volume from head unit, but that's not a big loss because I have run out of amp channels after installing front speakers and sub..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zako, post: 7549713, member: 629735"] I don't know what's the best way to do it, but Y splitter should be fine. I personally do not use a Y splitter. So my front pre-amp connects to the amplifier and then to the tweeters (with a capacitor inline to act as a crossover). My rear pre-amp connects to the other 2 channels on the same amplifier and then those channels power the woofers. The reason I did it this way so I were able to apply time alignment from my Kenwood head unit to tweeters and woofers independently from each other. This was one of the two motivations for me two switch to active (the other was to match levels better). Being able to time align each driver individually made a pretty big difference in SQ compared to the results with TA applied to passive component sets, and I haven't even tried to more "formal" ways of tuning TA yet (using pink noise, etc). So my "fader control" is now just a level control between tweeters and woofers, but I prefer to leave it at middle position, and tune amplifier gains instead. This means that I can't adjust my rear speaker volume from head unit, but that's not a big loss because I have run out of amp channels after installing front speakers and sub.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Speakers
Running Image Dynamics CTX65CS Active (Power Handling)
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list