Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TeoTorriatte" data-source="post: 2929376" data-attributes="member: 571999">I agree that the natural lpf effects created by high inductance can be minimized by intentionally limiting bandwidth (via an external lpf). But what are your thoughts on the other side effects of high inductance -- namely the fact that a VC is an inductor (which stores energy in the magnetic field). Is Dan accurate in stating that the higher the inductance, the longer the VC will hold the current before it starts to change?I have also seen some reference to using the ratio of Re/Le to determine a more accurate representation of effects caused by inductance (the higher the ratio, the better).&nbsp; Any thoughts on that?A few of the subs I&#039;ve used most recently would agree with that last theory:Dayton 12HF: 3.3/.95 = 3.47Dayton DVC12: 2.69/1.85 = 1.45eD 12O.14: 5.8/5.5 = 1.05Could be coincidence though, too. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/cool.gif.3bcaf8f141236c00f8044d07150e34f7.gif</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TeoTorriatte, post: 2929376, member: 571999"] I agree that the natural lpf effects created by high inductance can be minimized by intentionally limiting bandwidth (via an external lpf). But what are your thoughts on the other side effects of high inductance -- namely the fact that a VC is an inductor (which stores energy in the magnetic field). Is Dan accurate in stating that the higher the inductance, the longer the VC will hold the current before it starts to change? I have also seen some reference to using the ratio of Re/Le to determine a more accurate representation of effects caused by inductance (the higher the ratio, the better). Any thoughts on that? A few of the subs I've used most recently would agree with that last theory: Dayton 12HF: 3.3/.95 = 3.47 Dayton DVC12: 2.69/1.85 = 1.45 eD 12O.14: 5.8/5.5 = 1.05 Could be coincidence though, too. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/cool.gif.3bcaf8f141236c00f8044d07150e34f7.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification