Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Rumors on Sub size/ end them here
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="newusername" data-source="post: 2929137" data-attributes="member: 562064"><p>And he makes a good argument, but I'm not sure why we consider Fs and Qms to be important if mass does not relate at all. For low frequency response, inductance actually plays a very small role (in my opinion) relating to transient response, unless we are utilizing an abnormally large voice coil. Again, it is worth noting that our friend Richard Small equated driver mass to an inductor in a series RLC equivalent circuit.</p><p></p><p>I think Dan once mentioned since you cannot achieve ringing until you have experienced the "rise time" portion of transient response, that inductance was more important as it is the gateway to transient response. However, what if our intended bandwidth is narrow enough that the drivers upper frequency bandwidth is irrelevant? Why, that sounds like a subwoofer!</p><p></p><p></p><p>Thank you for a totally useless post in the middle of a decent thread. May I ask, which is worse: the noobs who don't know well enough not to ask that question, or the experienced poster who perpetuates it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="newusername, post: 2929137, member: 562064"] And he makes a good argument, but I'm not sure why we consider Fs and Qms to be important if mass does not relate at all. For low frequency response, inductance actually plays a very small role (in my opinion) relating to transient response, unless we are utilizing an abnormally large voice coil. Again, it is worth noting that our friend Richard Small equated driver mass to an inductor in a series RLC equivalent circuit. I think Dan once mentioned since you cannot achieve ringing until you have experienced the "rise time" portion of transient response, that inductance was more important as it is the gateway to transient response. However, what if our intended bandwidth is narrow enough that the drivers upper frequency bandwidth is irrelevant? Why, that sounds like a subwoofer! Thank you for a totally useless post in the middle of a decent thread. May I ask, which is worse: the noobs who don't know well enough not to ask that question, or the experienced poster who perpetuates it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Rumors on Sub size/ end them here
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list