Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Rumors on Sub size/ end them here
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="newusername" data-source="post: 2929020" data-attributes="member: 562064"><p>Well, I hate to disagree, but Dan's paper is a tad misleading. Perhaps a more detailed article on the concept is appropriate and I will work on that tonight.</p><p></p><p>Let's make an analogy for a moment, shall we?</p><p></p><p>I put a baseball on a tee, like I'm 4 years old again. I take a bat and swing at a 5lb ball with a given amount of force. The ball travels a distance relative to the weight of the ball and the amount of force I applied with the bat (just trying to keep things simple here). What if we use a 50lb ball and all other factors remain constant? Do we really think the ball is going to travel at the same velocity at any point in it's flight?</p><p></p><p>Again, that's a very loose analogy, but there are certainly more factors to be considered in the transient response equation than inductance. Dan's paper assumes that rise time is equivalent to transient response, when in fact, step response (the rise time and any ringing associated) is more appropriate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="newusername, post: 2929020, member: 562064"] Well, I hate to disagree, but Dan's paper is a tad misleading. Perhaps a more detailed article on the concept is appropriate and I will work on that tonight. Let's make an analogy for a moment, shall we? I put a baseball on a tee, like I'm 4 years old again. I take a bat and swing at a 5lb ball with a given amount of force. The ball travels a distance relative to the weight of the ball and the amount of force I applied with the bat (just trying to keep things simple here). What if we use a 50lb ball and all other factors remain constant? Do we really think the ball is going to travel at the same velocity at any point in it's flight? Again, that's a very loose analogy, but there are certainly more factors to be considered in the transient response equation than inductance. Dan's paper assumes that rise time is equivalent to transient response, when in fact, step response (the rise time and any ringing associated) is more appropriate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Rumors on Sub size/ end them here
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list