Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Rockford HU Problem
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="musclehead" data-source="post: 269086" data-attributes="member: 547855"><p>im not familiar with that model, but i just would like to say that i was very dissapointed with my rockford headunit. i bout it in 2000 shortly after they were first released. i didnt like the way they looked, but hey is fosgate. it wasnt very good the sq sucked. s/n is only 90. trust me u can tell an audible difference when compared to a reciever that has an s/n of 105. the internal amp was horrible. they may have changed since then but i doubt it. i was looking in crutchfield an the s/n was 80 something. i know its more to a headunit than s/n, but you wont see an alpine, clarion, pioneer or eclipse with a figure that low. its degrading. the rockford i had was very unreliable. when it was cold, it would skip a lot. i would suggest selling it and buying another brand. i used to be a huge rockford fan. i bought anything that said rockford because i thought the name ensured quality and power. WRONG!! i would still buy some of their products, but as far as headunits and punch amps go....NO WAY! get a new headunit man. im sorry for the long post.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="musclehead, post: 269086, member: 547855"] im not familiar with that model, but i just would like to say that i was very dissapointed with my rockford headunit. i bout it in 2000 shortly after they were first released. i didnt like the way they looked, but hey is fosgate. it wasnt very good the sq sucked. s/n is only 90. trust me u can tell an audible difference when compared to a reciever that has an s/n of 105. the internal amp was horrible. they may have changed since then but i doubt it. i was looking in crutchfield an the s/n was 80 something. i know its more to a headunit than s/n, but you wont see an alpine, clarion, pioneer or eclipse with a figure that low. its degrading. the rockford i had was very unreliable. when it was cold, it would skip a lot. i would suggest selling it and buying another brand. i used to be a huge rockford fan. i bought anything that said rockford because i thought the name ensured quality and power. WRONG!! i would still buy some of their products, but as far as headunits and punch amps go....NO WAY! get a new headunit man. im sorry for the long post. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Rockford HU Problem
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list