Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
RL-p vs XXX
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mrray13" data-source="post: 715686" data-attributes="member: 540942"><p>did i miss ur question? dude, i'm sorry.</p><p></p><p>my favorite enclosure for the ss..hmm....in the sealed, it sounds really nice. gets extremely low and quite loud. but it does the same in vented, tuned around 34hz.</p><p></p><p>best sq enclosure was definitrly the 1.25ft^3 sealed...just an amazing sounding sub in there. if a person wnated to go this route..i'd shoot for between 1.25-1.5ft^3 with between 750-900wrms..</p><p></p><p>best sql is definitely ported..it did absolutely beautiful in the 1.9ft^3 enclosure with 36in^2 of port..tuned to 34hz. got real low, got real loud. if a person wanted to go this way...i'd suggest anywhere from about 1.75-2ft^3 with a the same power.</p><p></p><p>of course, the SS handled 1200 wrms pretty easily. but it really doesn't need it. if u wanted an SS rl-p, those enclosures/power level should/would keep most ppl extremely happy!!</p><p></p><p>wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mrray13, post: 715686, member: 540942"] did i miss ur question? dude, i'm sorry. my favorite enclosure for the ss..hmm....in the sealed, it sounds really nice. gets extremely low and quite loud. but it does the same in vented, tuned around 34hz. best sq enclosure was definitrly the 1.25ft^3 sealed...just an amazing sounding sub in there. if a person wnated to go this route..i'd shoot for between 1.25-1.5ft^3 with between 750-900wrms.. best sql is definitely ported..it did absolutely beautiful in the 1.9ft^3 enclosure with 36in^2 of port..tuned to 34hz. got real low, got real loud. if a person wanted to go this way...i'd suggest anywhere from about 1.75-2ft^3 with a the same power. of course, the SS handled 1200 wrms pretty easily. but it really doesn't need it. if u wanted an SS rl-p, those enclosures/power level should/would keep most ppl extremely happy!! wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
RL-p vs XXX
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh