Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
RL-p vs XXX
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mrray13" data-source="post: 695089" data-attributes="member: 540942"><p>we might be...and please understand, i'm not bashing u either...</p><p></p><p>but i believe, going by manufacture's recommended enclosures, this playing field was indeed fairly level....no, it wasn't perfect, but it isn't exactly tilted in the rl-p's favor...</p><p></p><p>the box is bigger then both companies recommend..so the low end should be enhanced for both subs, regardless of power...and after reading that..if i went even bigger with the enclosure and power...it would give the rl-p an even bigger edge....so i guess i need to build a <em>smaller</em> box, according to re, so as to put the rl-p at a disadvantage and increase the power.....but that will only work in the rl-p's favor yet again, as the smaller enclosure is going to allow it to handle more power and put it in a SoundSplinter sized box for the power...so how do i build a level playing field?</p><p></p><p>and if the xxx suffers this much at the bottom due to lack of power in a larger the recommended box, how much power does it need to reproduce low freq's faithfully in the recommended .8ft^3??</p><p></p><p>wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mrray13, post: 695089, member: 540942"] we might be...and please understand, i'm not bashing u either... but i believe, going by manufacture's recommended enclosures, this playing field was indeed fairly level....no, it wasn't perfect, but it isn't exactly tilted in the rl-p's favor... the box is bigger then both companies recommend..so the low end should be enhanced for both subs, regardless of power...and after reading that..if i went even bigger with the enclosure and power...it would give the rl-p an even bigger edge....so i guess i need to build a [I]smaller[/I] box, according to re, so as to put the rl-p at a disadvantage and increase the power.....but that will only work in the rl-p's favor yet again, as the smaller enclosure is going to allow it to handle more power and put it in a SoundSplinter sized box for the power...so how do i build a level playing field? and if the xxx suffers this much at the bottom due to lack of power in a larger the recommended box, how much power does it need to reproduce low freq's faithfully in the recommended .8ft^3?? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
RL-p vs XXX
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh