Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
RL-p vs XXX
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pj_chevy03" data-source="post: 695043" data-attributes="member: 555301"><p>some of you are missing what mrray said to start with. he said "in this application" the SS had better low end. the xxx will not dominate everything in every application. no sub can do that.</p><p></p><p>was the xxx starved for power? of course, but i think what mrray was trying to show with this comparison is that if you have around 750 and a small sealed box that the SS is the choice. he never said that the SS was a superior sub period. he said it had a slightly better lowend <em>in the application</em> he used for both subs.</p><p></p><p>and about comaparing a 500w sub and 1600w sub, isn't it good to read something different than brahma vs. xxx. Nice little comparison here</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pj_chevy03, post: 695043, member: 555301"] some of you are missing what mrray said to start with. he said "in this application" the SS had better low end. the xxx will not dominate everything in every application. no sub can do that. was the xxx starved for power? of course, but i think what mrray was trying to show with this comparison is that if you have around 750 and a small sealed box that the SS is the choice. he never said that the SS was a superior sub period. he said it had a slightly better lowend [I]in the application[/I] he used for both subs. and about comaparing a 500w sub and 1600w sub, isn't it good to read something different than brahma vs. xxx. Nice little comparison here [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
RL-p vs XXX
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh