Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Miscellaneous Automotive
Car Electronics & Appearance
Car Performance & Repair
Ricers... /rant
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lil Poot" data-source="post: 1150584" data-attributes="member: 561892"><p>pardon me, i stand corrected. the zl-1's were not rated at 500 hp, they were rated at 600 hp. yes they did rate engines differently back then, they dynoed the engine at the flywheel with all accessories unhooked, but most muscle cars were underrated. figure 20 percent drivetrain loss, which is more than was probably seen and its still 500 rwhp.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.roadandtrack.com/idealbb/pview.asp?topicID=10766&amp;pageNo=2&amp;num=20" target="_blank">http://www.roadandtrack.com/idealbb/pview.asp?topicID=10766&amp;pageNo=2&amp;num=20</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lil Poot, post: 1150584, member: 561892"] pardon me, i stand corrected. the zl-1's were not rated at 500 hp, they were rated at 600 hp. yes they did rate engines differently back then, they dynoed the engine at the flywheel with all accessories unhooked, but most muscle cars were underrated. figure 20 percent drivetrain loss, which is more than was probably seen and its still 500 rwhp. [URL="http://www.roadandtrack.com/idealbb/pview.asp?topicID=10766&pageNo=2&num=20"]http://www.roadandtrack.com/idealbb/pview.asp?topicID=10766&pageNo=2&num=20[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Miscellaneous Automotive
Car Electronics & Appearance
Car Performance & Repair
Ricers... /rant
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
