Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Revolution!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Papermaker85" data-source="post: 8484879" data-attributes="member: 572595"><p>And the notation that we come from apes or even Neanderthals is totally bullish. So let me see you bring up a legitimate argument. Because you and just about everyone here failed to provide any creditable information that we did infact evolve from a single cell organism. its simply a FACT we have NEVER observed such a situation. is that not transparant enough? so go right ahead call me stupid. but by the looks of it i have enough intellegance to provide a effective argument and you cannot prove me wrong,</p><p></p><p>first i was full of **** on carbon dating. i said no way in hell its accurate enough to know exacly how old we or dinosures are esp in 100000+ years and they even "claim millions of year". get real.. i provided sereval sorces that back my point</p><p></p><p>then i argued we didnt evolve from apes. AGAIN i providing evidance that the changes of us doing so is very very unlikely. matter of fact its is strongly suggesting we are very unique and it is so astouding hard to prove we actually evolved from any other living orginisum we simply d not know and are every year being lead to the fact we might have been created uniquely.</p><p></p><p>again im going to provide you information that makes me think logically that eveloution is real but within its LIFES boundries..</p><p></p><p>that carbon dating isnt nearly as accurate as we where lead to believe. in fact just in the last 10 years it was extended to about 10-50k years of possible high accuracy.</p><p></p><p>that the laws we understand and are put in place i did take them out of context but we are simply lacking hte information to creat new laws on other subject matter but they seem to follow the fundementals with current laws in physics. certinally biogily is differnret in nature but the fundements seem to be similar. after all where made of of electrctrical charges and we are actually made of up of alot of "air". which the spacing between the nucleious and the atoms rings are composed of air inbetween them..</p><p></p><p>untill someone can provide information im sticking by waht i said. even it some of it was barble because its been a long *** time since i really discussed and looked into it so be it. show me some proof instead of calling me stupid cuz i culd easily do the same.</p><p></p><p>BTW that old *** car aint cool anymore step your game up..</p><p></p><p>i liked an artical from the most prostigest natural history musium that has some of the best minds in the field in hte work PROVING that its a very unlikely we eveloved from the said neanderthals and very highly unlikely from any breed of mamial remotly realted to the "monkeys"</p><p></p><p>so as far as i know im correct on htat matter with a very realible source to conform.</p><p></p><p>as far as the conservation of enegry. I totally under stand the vast different between it and genitics.</p><p></p><p>but the logic remains that these fundementas are revelant in all physical forms of like.</p><p></p><p>there is only so much input in a genitic coding. My point is every LIFE form has its competley unique DNA makeup.</p><p></p><p>these fundemental building blocks would require an addional block or alteration of that block to have such drastic changes in order to create a NEW LIFE form. which is exactly what human are as comprade to ANYTHING else man knows of..</p><p></p><p>IE humans chromosozes are completely different and in order for the to be changed to match that of a chimp you would have to have a genitically developed alteration. IE you cant put 10 in and get 11 out simply from elevoution as the theory suggest. so with a single cell Organism you cannot get a trillion cell orginisium by "luck" as thats pretty much what the theory states.. it vilolates the laws of consorvation and the laws of therminal dynamics which say. in an isolated system one cannot create new enegry/mass/matter.</p><p></p><p>SO that being said without single cell Organism contacting another Organism that was compatible to it in order to rearange its genetic structure(RNA NOT DNA) to form a more complex one it is physically impossible..</p><p></p><p>several people call me crazy dumb or foolish. which i very well may be but not one provides any FACT BASED information..</p><p></p><p>souldrop. i understand im using the law out of character. and i know its null and void in that sense but from all the discoverys in all areas of life thse fucmdemental laws do apply. you can make something out of nothing and you cannot naturally expand anything without a input based alteration.</p><p></p><p>like i sad matter didnt just show up. and eveloution didnt just start creation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Papermaker85, post: 8484879, member: 572595"] And the notation that we come from apes or even Neanderthals is totally bullish. So let me see you bring up a legitimate argument. Because you and just about everyone here failed to provide any creditable information that we did infact evolve from a single cell organism. its simply a FACT we have NEVER observed such a situation. is that not transparant enough? so go right ahead call me stupid. but by the looks of it i have enough intellegance to provide a effective argument and you cannot prove me wrong, first i was full of **** on carbon dating. i said no way in hell its accurate enough to know exacly how old we or dinosures are esp in 100000+ years and they even "claim millions of year". get real.. i provided sereval sorces that back my point then i argued we didnt evolve from apes. AGAIN i providing evidance that the changes of us doing so is very very unlikely. matter of fact its is strongly suggesting we are very unique and it is so astouding hard to prove we actually evolved from any other living orginisum we simply d not know and are every year being lead to the fact we might have been created uniquely. again im going to provide you information that makes me think logically that eveloution is real but within its LIFES boundries.. that carbon dating isnt nearly as accurate as we where lead to believe. in fact just in the last 10 years it was extended to about 10-50k years of possible high accuracy. that the laws we understand and are put in place i did take them out of context but we are simply lacking hte information to creat new laws on other subject matter but they seem to follow the fundementals with current laws in physics. certinally biogily is differnret in nature but the fundements seem to be similar. after all where made of of electrctrical charges and we are actually made of up of alot of "air". which the spacing between the nucleious and the atoms rings are composed of air inbetween them.. untill someone can provide information im sticking by waht i said. even it some of it was barble because its been a long *** time since i really discussed and looked into it so be it. show me some proof instead of calling me stupid cuz i culd easily do the same. BTW that old *** car aint cool anymore step your game up.. i liked an artical from the most prostigest natural history musium that has some of the best minds in the field in hte work PROVING that its a very unlikely we eveloved from the said neanderthals and very highly unlikely from any breed of mamial remotly realted to the "monkeys" so as far as i know im correct on htat matter with a very realible source to conform. as far as the conservation of enegry. I totally under stand the vast different between it and genitics. but the logic remains that these fundementas are revelant in all physical forms of like. there is only so much input in a genitic coding. My point is every LIFE form has its competley unique DNA makeup. these fundemental building blocks would require an addional block or alteration of that block to have such drastic changes in order to create a NEW LIFE form. which is exactly what human are as comprade to ANYTHING else man knows of.. IE humans chromosozes are completely different and in order for the to be changed to match that of a chimp you would have to have a genitically developed alteration. IE you cant put 10 in and get 11 out simply from elevoution as the theory suggest. so with a single cell Organism you cannot get a trillion cell orginisium by "luck" as thats pretty much what the theory states.. it vilolates the laws of consorvation and the laws of therminal dynamics which say. in an isolated system one cannot create new enegry/mass/matter. SO that being said without single cell Organism contacting another Organism that was compatible to it in order to rearange its genetic structure(RNA NOT DNA) to form a more complex one it is physically impossible.. several people call me crazy dumb or foolish. which i very well may be but not one provides any FACT BASED information.. souldrop. i understand im using the law out of character. and i know its null and void in that sense but from all the discoverys in all areas of life thse fucmdemental laws do apply. you can make something out of nothing and you cannot naturally expand anything without a input based alteration. like i sad matter didnt just show up. and eveloution didnt just start creation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Revolution!
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
