Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Umbra" data-source="post: 8260800" data-attributes="member: 658055">I&#039;ve done some more reading and now I&#039;m even more indecisive than before. It seems coaxials would be sufficient for rear fill, but if I have backseat passengers often (which I do), then components would offer the passengers better SQ.I think either way adding speakers in the back should help keep my sound stage forward and away from the subs.If I built enclosures for the woofers in the rear deck, that would protect it from pressurization, right? Might it also help with midbass? There&#039;s enough room in the trunk above the sub box for me to surround the speakers in mdf. I could just turn the adapter I&#039;d make into a box and secure the deck, woofer, and box with some screws and tee nuts.One last question, the frequency response for the components goes down to 63 Hz. Right now the front speakers and subs are crossed over at 80hz. If I brought this down, would that help or hurt midbass response?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Umbra, post: 8260800, member: 658055"] I've done some more reading and now I'm even more indecisive than before. It seems coaxials would be sufficient for rear fill, but if I have backseat passengers often (which I do), then components would offer the passengers better SQ. I think either way adding speakers in the back should help keep my sound stage forward and away from the subs. If I built enclosures for the woofers in the rear deck, that would protect it from pressurization, right? Might it also help with midbass? There's enough room in the trunk above the sub box for me to surround the speakers in mdf. I could just turn the adapter I'd make into a box and secure the deck, woofer, and box with some screws and tee nuts. One last question, the frequency response for the components goes down to 63 Hz. Right now the front speakers and subs are crossed over at 80hz. If I brought this down, would that help or hurt midbass response? [/QUOTE]

Verification