Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Religion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brock" data-source="post: 2122140" data-attributes="member: 544716"><p>Yes and no. Humans are a product of their environment. Add the ability to reason to that and you get a whole bunch of people who want to argue their point of view rather than just follow the leader like most other animal species. People learn morals, just look at the vast differences of culture across the planet; it varies by environment.</p><p></p><p>To say that science can explain this would be arguable on either side. Here is my theory: You have a seed, lets say, that will grow into a tree. Now, science can explain where that seed came from, what it will grow into, as well as the causality of the processes throughout its lifespan. This is common knowledge. What isn't common knowledge is the underlying theme of <em>why </em>that certain 'causality' results in such an awesome change (and I mean awesome by its proper definition). I think as much as science thinks it can explain everything, it lacks that basic principle of why. I can't explain it either. To me, that is proof enough that "God" exists.</p><p></p><p>Relate that to Humans and there you have it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brock, post: 2122140, member: 544716"] Yes and no. Humans are a product of their environment. Add the ability to reason to that and you get a whole bunch of people who want to argue their point of view rather than just follow the leader like most other animal species. People learn morals, just look at the vast differences of culture across the planet; it varies by environment. To say that science can explain this would be arguable on either side. Here is my theory: You have a seed, lets say, that will grow into a tree. Now, science can explain where that seed came from, what it will grow into, as well as the causality of the processes throughout its lifespan. This is common knowledge. What isn't common knowledge is the underlying theme of [I]why [/I]that certain 'causality' results in such an awesome change (and I mean awesome by its proper definition). I think as much as science thinks it can explain everything, it lacks that basic principle of why. I can't explain it either. To me, that is proof enough that "God" exists. Relate that to Humans and there you have it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Religion
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list