Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Speakers
Rear fill overkill?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OdieTRP" data-source="post: 639360" data-attributes="member: 557667"><p>Because it's what she wants, plain and simple. She carries passengers and wants rear speakers. It is not up for debate! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smash.gif.499e08a4a35ffaf54f4c8194fb8fe8ed.gif Were it my system there would be no rear stage.</p><p></p><p>I understand the theory that the best speakers should be up front for staging, imaging, etc. The Alpine Type X's are rated at 70 RMS (2003 models); bi-amping them would fry the tweet wouldn't it? Even bridging the amp would put at least 150 per ch to them which is way more than they're rated for. I got them new for $150/set and bought two sets. I am trying to prevent spending a lot money and could put the other set in the rear. Why should I spend even $50 for a set of Planet Audio coax's or $100 for Type S 6x9's that will sound like shit when I have a good set of speakers to put back there? It's one heck of a dilemma and paradox, can the rear speakers be too good? The HU is a 9830. If I do put coax's back there, can the 4 channels from the HU be bridged to two and run off the rear RCA's to get 36w per channel?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OdieTRP, post: 639360, member: 557667"] Because it's what she wants, plain and simple. She carries passengers and wants rear speakers. It is not up for debate! [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smash.gif.499e08a4a35ffaf54f4c8194fb8fe8ed.gif[/IMG] Were it my system there would be no rear stage. I understand the theory that the best speakers should be up front for staging, imaging, etc. The Alpine Type X's are rated at 70 RMS (2003 models); bi-amping them would fry the tweet wouldn't it? Even bridging the amp would put at least 150 per ch to them which is way more than they're rated for. I got them new for $150/set and bought two sets. I am trying to prevent spending a lot money and could put the other set in the rear. Why should I spend even $50 for a set of Planet Audio coax's or $100 for Type S 6x9's that will sound like shit when I have a good set of speakers to put back there? It's one heck of a dilemma and paradox, can the rear speakers be too good? The HU is a 9830. If I do put coax's back there, can the 4 channels from the HU be bridged to two and run off the rear RCA's to get 36w per channel? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Speakers
Rear fill overkill?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list