Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Acevolkov" data-source="post: 4982885" data-attributes="member: 600865">I run a 12&quot; MT at 2.5 cu ft @ 35Hz. Believe it or not, I talked to the tech guy at RE Audio and he said that 2.5 cu ft was perfect for 2500W RMS and daily with a burp now and then for entertainment. The only real problem I have with the subwoofer is the terrible tinsel lead slap. It has weakened the tinsel leads and wore a grove into 4 spots on the woofer, and it makes some sound at certain tones and volumes. But it IS a 100% SPL designed woofer. So a little tinsel slap for massive power and SPL? You decide if its worth it, it was for me. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gifI&#039;ve seen some of the new SX&#039;s have a soft fabic where the leads could come in contact with the cone. Maybe the new MT&#039;s have the cloth too. I bought mine in 2005 before all the USAmps business, so I don&#039;t have it on mine.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Acevolkov, post: 4982885, member: 600865"] I run a 12" MT at 2.5 cu ft @ 35Hz. Believe it or not, I talked to the tech guy at RE Audio and he said that 2.5 cu ft was perfect for 2500W RMS and daily with a burp now and then for entertainment. The only real problem I have with the subwoofer is the terrible tinsel lead slap. It has weakened the tinsel leads and wore a grove into 4 spots on the woofer, and it makes some sound at certain tones and volumes. But it IS a 100% SPL designed woofer. So a little tinsel slap for massive power and SPL? You decide if its worth it, it was for me. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif[/IMG] I've seen some of the new SX's have a soft fabic where the leads could come in contact with the cone. Maybe the new MT's have the cloth too. I bought mine in 2005 before all the USAmps business, so I don't have it on mine. [/QUOTE]

Verification