Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ThxOne" data-source="post: 8678729" data-attributes="member: 675210">I don&#039;t doubt that at all... the 240z didn&#039;t handle as well as the 1982 280zx Turbo I referenced against the 1982 Corvette. Again, you can&#039;t say I am wrong when you are comparing the wrong things. I don&#039;t hate the Corvette, I just know they were not all they were cracked up to be. I have owned cars that were faster than their same year counterpart Corvette... and my interiors weren&#039;t shitty plastic materials that made noise all day when you drove them. From 1968 to 2004 for ME personally, I am not impressed in the least with Corvettes. If you want to have fun in a GM vehicle smartly, then this is what I would do. I would find and buy a 2002 Pontiac Firebird ***** Am WS6 and force feed it some extra air and fuel. Stock they did 0 - 60mph in under 5 seconds so give it 200 more horsepower. Who needs a Vette?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ThxOne, post: 8678729, member: 675210"] I don't doubt that at all... the 240z didn't handle as well as the [B][U][I]1982 280zx Turbo[/I][/U][/B] I referenced against the [B][U][I]1982 Corvette[/I][/U][/B]. Again, you can't say I am wrong when you are comparing the wrong things. I don't hate the Corvette, I just know they were not all they were cracked up to be. I have owned cars that were faster than their same year counterpart Corvette... and my interiors weren't shitty plastic materials that made noise all day when you drove them. From 1968 to 2004 for ME personally, I am not impressed in the least with Corvettes. If you want to have fun in a GM vehicle smartly, then this is what I would do. I would find and buy a 2002 Pontiac Firebird ***** Am WS6 and force feed it some extra air and fuel. Stock they did 0 - 60mph in under 5 seconds so give it 200 more horsepower. Who needs a Vette? [/QUOTE]

Verification