Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="thefunkybunch" data-source="post: 3344550" data-attributes="member: 563903">can&#039;t speak for the rainbow&#039;s because i&#039;ve never personally heard them (nobody around here carries them) but i&#039;ve owned the Z6 and absolutely loved them.&nbsp; honestly more midbass than you really need, i actually had to EQ the low end down a bit.&nbsp; midrange/vocals were extremely clear and natural sounding, not strained or tinny like a lot of speakers i&#039;ve heard (even compared to some very nice sets like the jl ZR&#039;s).&nbsp; tweets are very smooth, clear, and accurate.&nbsp; there was honestly nothing at all i did not like about them, except that they need a TON of power to get going.&nbsp; i ended up bridging a boston GT22 on each mid, and running the tweets off a GT20 just because i like the added headroom, but they were fine running a single GT22 on the mids and the GT20 on the tweets.&nbsp; a jl audio 450/4 would be ideal for the set.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="thefunkybunch, post: 3344550, member: 563903"] can't speak for the rainbow's because i've never personally heard them (nobody around here carries them) but i've owned the Z6 and absolutely [I]loved[/I] them. honestly more midbass than you really need, i actually had to EQ the low end down a bit. midrange/vocals were extremely clear and natural sounding, not strained or tinny like a lot of speakers i've heard (even compared to some very nice sets like the jl ZR's). tweets are very smooth, clear, and accurate. there was honestly nothing at all i did not like about them, except that they need a TON of power to get going. i ended up bridging a boston GT22 on each mid, and running the tweets off a GT20 just because i like the added headroom, but they were fine running a single GT22 on the mids and the GT20 on the tweets. a jl audio 450/4 would be ideal for the set. [/QUOTE]

Verification