Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="OlogyAudio" data-source="post: 1123599" data-attributes="member: 562170">2x for most of that //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifChad&#039;s super midwoofer in the CF variety... seems promising though... I&#039;m expecting to see great midrange clarity to atleast 1.5khz with that sucker...&nbsp; Perfect match for a hella expensive seas tweeter if you ask me //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif -- not so much any rainbow tweeter (except the one they use in the ref. sets...&nbsp; the one they use in the platinum sets isn&#039;t too shabby but I do believe it only has .5mm p-p travel (not bad for a tweeter rly -- but... 1mm would do the trick... -- anywho the .5 limits dynamics with a xover point that low)Which gets me to another topic -- while low xmax drivers can have very exceptional midbass quality -- the xmax ultimately limits the quantity of the high quality midbass in the say 150hz and under rangeAdditionally some of those errors in the paper could have just been translation problems... but that graph on p4 was still misleading no matter how you look at it... I love marketing... -- I still think that is why it was pulled -- some higherups realized whoever wrote it screwed up -- and they didn&#039;t want to mislead anyone...&nbsp; That is my guess -- and I&#039;m hoping thats why they pulled it...&nbsp; More honorable if this is the case //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifAs for my sets competing with rainbow in terms of quality -- that IS the idea.Already have a review which asserts me as better for the price than ED or CDT HD by a wide margin -- just need something comparing CDT&#039;s high end with my mid end... and Rainbows of various prices with my sets as well (coming as soon as Blue gets his)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="OlogyAudio, post: 1123599, member: 562170"] 2x for most of that [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] Chad's super midwoofer in the CF variety... seems promising though... I'm expecting to see great midrange clarity to atleast 1.5khz with that sucker... Perfect match for a hella expensive seas tweeter if you ask me [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] -- not so much any rainbow tweeter (except the one they use in the ref. sets... the one they use in the platinum sets isn't too shabby but I do believe it only has .5mm p-p travel (not bad for a tweeter rly -- but... 1mm would do the trick... -- anywho the .5 limits dynamics with a xover point that low) Which gets me to another topic -- while low xmax drivers can have very exceptional midbass quality -- the xmax ultimately limits the quantity of the high quality midbass in the say 150hz and under range Additionally some of those errors in the paper could have just been translation problems... but that graph on p4 was still misleading no matter how you look at it... I love marketing... -- I still think that is why it was pulled -- some higherups realized whoever wrote it screwed up -- and they didn't want to mislead anyone... That is my guess -- and I'm hoping thats why they pulled it... More honorable if this is the case [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] As for my sets competing with rainbow in terms of quality -- that IS the idea. Already have a review which asserts me as better for the price than ED or CDT HD by a wide margin -- just need something comparing CDT's high end with my mid end... and Rainbows of various prices with my sets as well (coming as soon as Blue gets his) [/QUOTE]

Verification