Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Question for weightlifters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gettnbig" data-source="post: 400346" data-attributes="member: 548238"><p>Andro itself is crap. Andro is old school in the world of prohormones. It is not crap so to speak. It is beneficial to some but mostly to older athletes. These new prohormones that I mentioned are like updated versions of andro. They have the same goal in mind as andro but are much more successful at it. They are utilized better by the body and are effective to more people than andro is. Andro has almost become a product name for prohormones the way "Walkman" became the product name for portable cassette players. When saying "andro is crap" I am referring to the prohormone androstenedione and not all "andro" products. Like I said, look into the 1 test, 1AD products, basically anything that is a derivatve of 1-testosterone. These seem to be the most effective ones, so I have been told.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gettnbig, post: 400346, member: 548238"] Andro itself is crap. Andro is old school in the world of prohormones. It is not crap so to speak. It is beneficial to some but mostly to older athletes. These new prohormones that I mentioned are like updated versions of andro. They have the same goal in mind as andro but are much more successful at it. They are utilized better by the body and are effective to more people than andro is. Andro has almost become a product name for prohormones the way "Walkman" became the product name for portable cassette players. When saying "andro is crap" I am referring to the prohormone androstenedione and not all "andro" products. Like I said, look into the 1 test, 1AD products, basically anything that is a derivatve of 1-testosterone. These seem to be the most effective ones, so I have been told. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Question for weightlifters
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list