Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Paul73" data-source="post: 2467539" data-attributes="member: 571984">That&#039;s not a whole lot compared to what is typically known as an underrated amp. In all reality, at those power levels an extra 180 watts isnt&#039; going to even be audible. In effect what that works out to is an extra 45 watts/channel in 4 ohm stereo mode....just about usual for these amps, a far cry from the the cheater amps of the day. Not trying to take anything away from your ampp at all, I am a die hard certified PPI nut and have owned every series of amp they have produced from the Arts and AMs down to the Sedona&#039;s (anybody remember those?) Again my point is, at 1400 watts running subs, an extra 180 would hardly even show up on the meter, let alone to your ears. If it weren&#039;t for all the **** current they pull, I would have that very same amp running my Avalanche. I ran my kick panels for quite a while on my Art 600.2....WOW! Loud and Clean is all I can say, my favorite amp to date.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Paul73, post: 2467539, member: 571984"] That's not a [I]whole lot[/I] compared to what is typically known as an underrated amp. In all reality, at those power levels an extra 180 watts isnt' going to even be audible. In effect what that works out to is an extra 45 watts/channel in 4 ohm stereo mode....just about usual for these amps, a far cry from the the cheater amps of the day. Not trying to take anything away from your ampp at all, I am a die hard certified PPI nut and have owned every series of amp they have produced from the Arts and AMs down to the Sedona's (anybody remember those?) Again my point is, at 1400 watts running subs, an extra 180 would hardly even show up on the meter, let alone to your ears. If it weren't for all the **** current they pull, I would have that very same amp running my Avalanche. I ran my kick panels for quite a while on my Art 600.2....WOW! Loud and Clean is all I can say, my favorite amp to date. [/QUOTE]

Verification