Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
port size question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="96civ" data-source="post: 1419410" data-attributes="member: 564776"><p>The kicker manual shows air volumes that aren't exactly best for your driver. If the TOTAL internal air volume (both subs included) is 3-4 ft^3, it's not going to sound all that great -- the bass will be boomy. Technically, if you wanted to get the best overall sound out of using a sealed enclosure, (with a qtc of .707) you would need nearly 9.67 ft^3 PER sub. That's only one of the subs and because you have two subs, it will need a total of 19.34ft^3... not very space efficient. If I were you I would continue the ported route because IMO ported's have better SQ for the space it takes up, as well as it has more potential to be louder. I can tell you this from experience because I had a 1.5ft^3 sealed enclosure for my 05s12l504 and it would be boomier, couldn't hit lower bass notes well... so I upgraded to a ported box and it sounds soo much better. If I wanted to achieve similar bass handling from the same sub I would have needed 4.3ft^3 airspace instead of the total 3.366ft^3 I had for the ported box, including port and driver displacement.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="96civ, post: 1419410, member: 564776"] The kicker manual shows air volumes that aren't exactly best for your driver. If the TOTAL internal air volume (both subs included) is 3-4 ft^3, it's not going to sound all that great -- the bass will be boomy. Technically, if you wanted to get the best overall sound out of using a sealed enclosure, (with a qtc of .707) you would need nearly 9.67 ft^3 PER sub. That's only one of the subs and because you have two subs, it will need a total of 19.34ft^3... not very space efficient. If I were you I would continue the ported route because IMO ported's have better SQ for the space it takes up, as well as it has more potential to be louder. I can tell you this from experience because I had a 1.5ft^3 sealed enclosure for my 05s12l504 and it would be boomier, couldn't hit lower bass notes well... so I upgraded to a ported box and it sounds soo much better. If I wanted to achieve similar bass handling from the same sub I would have needed 4.3ft^3 airspace instead of the total 3.366ft^3 I had for the ported box, including port and driver displacement. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
port size question
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list