Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Farside" data-source="post: 443624" data-attributes="member: 554476">Well the port runs beside the sub then turns 90 deg and runs along the bottom of the enclosure underneath the sub right under the magnet.I guess since it under the magnet then air wont be blowing directly into the port from the sub then you say I&#039;ll be ok?If I use the 1.848 ft^3 that WinISO predicted then the port will be 1&quot; under the magnet but still 3&quot; from the bottom of the enclosure for 14&quot; x 16&quot; x 22&quot; box.If I increase to 2.0 ft^3 the i go from 16&quot; deep to 17&quot; deep and the port will be 2&quot; under the subs magnet, and a bit shorter....according to WinISO this doesnt change things too much. The air maximum velocity increases a little to 35 m/s but its way down at 23Hz.This would be alot easier if I knew how to attach a picture. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Farside, post: 443624, member: 554476"] Well the port runs beside the sub then turns 90 deg and runs along the bottom of the enclosure underneath the sub right under the magnet. I guess since it under the magnet then air wont be blowing directly into the port from the sub then you say I'll be ok? If I use the 1.848 ft^3 that WinISO predicted then the port will be 1" under the magnet but still 3" from the bottom of the enclosure for 14" x 16" x 22" box. If I increase to 2.0 ft^3 the i go from 16" deep to 17" deep and the port will be 2" under the subs magnet, and a bit shorter[I]....according to WinISO this doesnt change things too much. The air maximum velocity increases a little to 35 m/s but its way down at 23Hz.[/I] [I]This would be alot easier if I knew how to attach a picture. [/I][IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG][I] [/I] [/QUOTE]

Verification