Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Port back vs up: The horse is still alive.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wickedwitt" data-source="post: 8020896" data-attributes="member: 622908"><p>I don't remember him saying this was an SQ competition system. Yes, they sound wonderful, they are musical. They reproduce the sounds without distortion at high volumes. That's all I ask of them. Size of the driver doesn't automatically tint the reproduction of the sound... Smaller drivers simply take less motor and less power to be accurate. That is the only real difference. Soft part weight has little to do with actual sound. Size under high excursion does offer more chances for cone contortion, which is where the illusion of "big subs can't sound good" comes from. Well designed soft parts will reproduce the same sound in larger cones as they do in smaller.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: As a matter of fact, I can displace the same amount of air with less excursion than your 9510 did, therefore my subs would be less subject to tonal anomalies.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wickedwitt, post: 8020896, member: 622908"] I don't remember him saying this was an SQ competition system. Yes, they sound wonderful, they are musical. They reproduce the sounds without distortion at high volumes. That's all I ask of them. Size of the driver doesn't automatically tint the reproduction of the sound... Smaller drivers simply take less motor and less power to be accurate. That is the only real difference. Soft part weight has little to do with actual sound. Size under high excursion does offer more chances for cone contortion, which is where the illusion of "big subs can't sound good" comes from. Well designed soft parts will reproduce the same sound in larger cones as they do in smaller. EDIT: As a matter of fact, I can displace the same amount of air with less excursion than your 9510 did, therefore my subs would be less subject to tonal anomalies. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
Port back vs up: The horse is still alive.
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh