Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DS-21" data-source="post: 6601487" data-attributes="member: 577690">Do you not understand basic English subject-verb relationships when you read other people&#039;s written words?&nbsp; You obviously don&#039;t understand the foundational literature about sonic differences in audio amplifiers despite your willingness to preach things that any rational and civilized person knows are simply falsehoods, so such a lack of foundation in other fields would not shock me.Let me simplify for you, Tommy.*&nbsp; I wrote earlier that I had e-mailed and spoken on the phone with certain individuals.&nbsp; You then somehow equated that communication with &quot;usenet.&quot;&nbsp; I pointed out your seeming inability to digest the words in front of your face.&nbsp; I was pointing out your inability to think (the object of the phrase you bolded was &quot;your thought processes&quot;) not anything about the mechanics of your writing.Your reply was nonsensical for, among other reasons, the lack of obvious grammatical or spelling errors in your text I quoted.I realize that I write like an actual educated adult, with subordinate clauses and such.&nbsp; Perhaps that is unfair to you.&nbsp; Maybe I need to write in baby sentences so your poor little head can understand my words.Again, perhaps you have a local community college or GED tutoring center that can help you get a more solid foundation in basic logic, reasoning, and reading comprehension skills.&nbsp; Which is to say, a foundation at all.*In case your musical education is as poor as your education in the rudiments of audio science and your education in basic English reading comprehension, in calling you &quot;Tommy&quot; I am calling you deaf, dumb, and blind.&nbsp; It is a reference to a character in the Who&#039;s rock opera of the same name.&nbsp; I decline, however, to comment on your skills at pinball.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DS-21, post: 6601487, member: 577690"] Do you not understand basic English subject-verb relationships when you read other people's written words? You obviously don't understand the foundational literature about sonic differences in audio amplifiers despite your willingness to preach things that any rational and civilized person knows are simply falsehoods, so such a lack of foundation in other fields would not shock me. Let me simplify for you, Tommy.* I wrote earlier that I had e-mailed and spoken on the phone with certain individuals. You then somehow equated that communication with "usenet." I pointed out your seeming inability to digest the words in front of your face. I was pointing out your inability to think (the object of the phrase you bolded was "your thought processes") not anything about the mechanics of your writing. Your reply was nonsensical for, among other reasons, the lack of obvious grammatical or spelling errors in your text I quoted. I realize that I write like an actual educated adult, with subordinate clauses and such. Perhaps that is unfair to you. Maybe I need to write in baby sentences so your poor little head can understand my words. Again, perhaps you have a local community college or GED tutoring center that can help you get a more solid foundation in basic logic, reasoning, and reading comprehension skills. Which is to say, a foundation at all. *In case your musical education is as poor as your education in the rudiments of audio science and your education in basic English reading comprehension, in calling you "Tommy" I am calling you deaf, dumb, and blind. It is a reference to a character in the Who's rock opera of the same name. I decline, however, to comment on your skills at pinball. [/QUOTE]

Verification